Manipur High Court

WP(C)/252/2026 of Ngangom Rambhapati Devi and 17 Ors Vs State of Manipur and Anr on 10 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2026 & Page 1 of 2 MC(WP(C)) No. 273 of 2026 Item Nos. 98-99 IN THE

WP(C) No. 252 of 2026 &

Item Nos. 98-99

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No. 252 of 2026

Ngangom Rambhapati Devi & 17 Ors.

…Petitioners

- Versus -

State of Manipur & Anr.

…Respondents

With

MC(WP(C)) No. 273 of 2026

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

11-05-2026

Heard Mr. N. Jotendro, learned senior counsel assisted by Md. Syed Murtaza Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Th. Vashum, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.

The 18 petitioners are working as Hindi Primary Teachers on contract basis and by the present writ petition, they pray for directions to the respondents to allow them to continue in service till they are provided an opportunity to appear in the next Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) examination, for release of unpaid wages/salaries w.e.f. September, 2025 till date and for conduct of TET examination within a reasonable time. The 18 petitioners have also submitted separate representations dated 06-03-2026, 09-03- 2026 and 10-03-2026 for allowing to continue in services as Hindi Primary Teachers on contract basis till their appearance in TET examination and for release of their wages. It is submitted that the representations are pending before the competent authority and the learned senior counsel for the WP(C) No. 252 of 2026 &

petitioners submits that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing the respondents, especially respondent No. 2, i.e. Director, Education (S), Manipur to dispose of the representations submitted by the petitioners by a speaking order within a stipulated time.

Mr. Th. Vashum, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents, submits that the State respondents want to file counter affidavit but for a limited prayer of the petitioners for disposing of the representations, this Court may pass an appropriate order.

Considering the submissions made at the Bar, this Court is of the view that the writ petition may be disposed of by directing respondent No. 2, i.e. Director, Education (S), Manipur to dispose of the representations submitted by the petitioners [Annexure-A/4 (Series)] by a speaking order as per law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above direction.

MC(WP(C)) No. 273 of 2026 is also disposed of.

JUDGE Victoria NINGOM BAM VICTORIA Digitally signed by NINGOMBAM VICTORIA Date: 2026.05.13 11:06:19 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead