Manipur High Court

CRP(C.R.P. Art.227)/51/2023 of PHIJAM (N) LAITONJAM (O) SHOBHAPATI DEVI AND 3 OTHERS Vs PHIJAM CHAOBA SINGH on 6 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Item No. 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 51 of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Item No. 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL CRP(CRP.Art.227) No. 51 of 2023 Phijam (N) Laitonjam (O) Shobhapati Devi & 3 ors.

Petitioner/s Vrs. Phijam Chaoba Singh Respondent/s BEFORE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR (ORDER) 07.05.2026 When the matter was taken up, Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel along with Mr. N. Vijay Kumar Singh, learned counsel on record for revision petitioners and Mr. Dayali Elangbam, learned counsel for sole respondent are before this Court. After some arguments, counsel on record for revision petitioners Mr. Th. Mahira sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned CRP(Civil Revision Petition) but made a plea to preserve the rights and contentions of the revision petitioners to take out an interlocutory application in Trial Court with a prayer qua sole respondent seeking injunction against putting up further constructions (superstructures). Leave sought and request are acceded to. Permitted to withdraw and rights and contentions of revision petitioners are preserved to the limited extent indicated herein. A scanned reproduction of endorsement made by learned counsel on record for revision petitioners in the case file is as follows: LAIRENM AYUM INDRAJE ET SINGH Digitally signed by LAIRENMAYUM INDRAJEET SINGH Date: 2026.05.07 16:28:21 +05'30'

If the revision petitioners take out an interlocutory application with an interim prayer qua sole respondent as regards putting up further constructions (superstructures), the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law by the Trial Court untrammeled by instant withdrawal. Rights of the revision petitioners are preserved to this limited extent. As regards main suit, though obvious, for the purpose of specificity it is made clear that the Trial Court shall proceed with the suit/trial on its own merits and in accordance with law untrammeled by withdrawal of captioned CRP. Captioned CRP is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with limited preservation of rights in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs. CHIEF JUSTICE Indrajeet

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead