Manipur High Court
MC(WA)/17/2026 of State of Manipur and 4 Ors Vs K Shantabiren Singh on 6 May 2026
of 3 Supp.-1, Sl. No. 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
Supp.-1, Sl. No. 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
MC(WA) No. 17 of 2026
Ref:- Rev. Petn. No. 41 of 2025
1. The State of Manipur through the Commissioner (Works), Government of Manipur at Secretariat Building, Mantripukhri, Imphal West – 795001.
2. The Chief Engineer, P.W.D., Manipur at Khuyathong, Imphal – 795001.
3. The Executive Engineer, Building Division No. III, P.W.D., Manipur at Khoyathong – 795001.
4. The Commissioner/Secretary (Health), Government of Manipur at Secretariat Building, Mantripukhri, Imphal West – 795001.
5. The Director of Health Services at Lamphel, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795001.
……Applicants/Appellants
-Versus-
Shri K. Shantabiren Singh, aged about 62 years, S/o (l) K.
Kullachandra Singh of Taobungkhok Awang, P.O. Langjing &
P.S. Patsoi, Imphal West District, Manipur – 795001.
….. Respondent
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA
For the Applicants/Appellants
::
Mr. Oinam Ratan Kumar,
State Counsel
Date of Hearing
::
07.05.2026
Date of Order
::
07.05.2026
SHAMURAILATPAM
SUSHIL SHARMA
Digitally signed by
SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL SHARMA
Date: 2026.05.07 17:29:02 +05'30'
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
(M. Sundar, CJ)
Captioned ‘MC’ (‘Miscellaneous Case’) has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of certified copy.
When the matter was taken up, Mr. Oinam Ratan Kumar, learned State Counsel was before this Court.
It came to light that even the date on which application for certified copy (online) was made has not been mentioned in the MC affidavit. It is bereft of requisite material particulars.
Faced with the above situation, learned State Counsel sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned MC but made a further plea to preserve the rights and contentions of MC applicants (State) to file another MC application with the same prayer giving better and fuller particulars which are necessary to buttress the prayer.
In this regard, the endorsement made by learned State Counsel in the case file is as follows :
In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned MC is disposed of as withdrawn/closed albeit with preservation of rights and contentions as set out supra. There shall be no order as to costs.
JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
FR/NFR Sushil
P.S. I : Upload forthwith P.S. II : All concerned will stand bound by web copy uploaded in High Court website inter-alia as the same is QR coded.