Manipur High Court
WP(C)/1170/2018 of SOCIAL REFORMERS CLUB Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 6 ORS on 5 May 2026
1170 of 2018 Contd…/- IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C)
Contd…/-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 1170 of 2018
Social Reformers Club
… Petitioner
Vs.
State of Manipur & ors.
… Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
06-05-2026
Heard Mr. L. Shyam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appearing for the respondents.
The present petition has been filed by the Social Reformers’ Club, Khurai Nandeibam/ Puthiba Leikai, Imphal East represented by its President, Shri Phijam Ibohanbi Singh.s It is the case of the petitioner that the authorities, without giving any notice and without following any due process of law, initiated action for eviction of the petitioner. Having been aggrieved, the present writ petition has been filed challenging the alleged eviction proceedings.
The counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the present petition can be disposed of by issuing a simple direction to the respondents not to evict the petitioner without following due process of law and without giving prior notice and opportunity of being heard to it. Suppl. 1, IN. 1 +05'30'
Contd…/-
Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appearing for the respondents submitted that he has no objection in disposing of this writ petition as prayed for by the counsel appearing for the petitioner.
In view of the submission made above and the consensus arrived at by the counsel appearing for the parties, the present writ petition is being disposed of with the direction that the petitioner should not be evicted by the respondents without following due process of law and without giving prior notice and opportunity of being heard.
With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of.
JUDGE Devananda
-2-