Manipur High Court
MC(WP(C))/48/2024 of Vareiyo Vasha And Anr Vs State Of Manipur And 6 Ors on 1 April 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 80 of 2024
Item No. 69-70
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 80 of 2024 with
MC(WP(C) No. 48 of 2024
Vareiyo Vasha & Anr.
…..Petitioner/s
-Versus-
State of Manipur & 6 Ors.
….Respondent/s
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
02.04.2026
Present Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned G.A. for the State respondent and Mr. W. Darakishwor, learned Sr. PCCG appearing on behalf of respondent No. 3 (CBI). None appeared on behalf of the private respondents.
The petitioners who are depositors with M/S Pandam Nidhi Limited approached this Court with a direction to attach the property of respondent Nos. 6 & 7 and also handing over the investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
During the course of hearing, Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are confining the relief in prayer No. c (ii) for a direction to handover the investigation to CBI. Learned counsel submits that on behalf of the competent authority, the Director, Institutional Finance, Manipur has requested the Joint Secretary, Home Department, Government of Manipur vide letter dated 10.11.2025 expressing that the competent authority is of the view that CBI is the appropriate agency to investigate the case against M/S Pandam Nidhi Ltd. And M/S PayGD Enterprises.
The letter dated 10.11.2025 is taken on record.
Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that since the competent authority has already expressed its view of transferring the case to CBI and is in the process, the writ petition may be disposed of at this stage.
This Court has considered the materials on record. Without expressing any opinion on the merit, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and subsequent letter dated 10.11.2025, writ petition is closed. Misc. application is also closed.
Interim order, if any, is merged with the final order.
JUDGE
Kh. Joshua Maring
KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2026.04.04 10:19:26 +05'30'