Manipur High Court

WP(C)/195/2026 of Tongbram Subhash Singh and Anr Vs State of Manipur and 2 Ors on 12 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2026 Page 1 of 2 Item No. 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT

Item No. 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No. 195 of 2026

Tongbram Subhash Singh & Anr.

…Petitioners

- Versus -

State of Manipur & 2 Ors.

…Respondents

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

13-03-2026

Heard Mrs. N. Savitri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as Legal Aid Counsel.

By the present petition, the petitioners are praying for directions to the respondents to pay a sum of Rs. 68,00,000/- as compensation to the petitioners for the lost and destruction of their entire house and machinery during the Manipur violence and to consider the representation dated 11-08- 2025 addressed to the Commissioner (Home), Government of Manipur within a time bound period.

Mr. Niranjan Sanasam, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents, submits that the petitioners have submitted the representation not in the format prescribed in this regard and during the course of hearing, he undertakes to handover a copy of the prescribed format to the learned counsel for the petitioners.

Mrs. N. Savitri, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition may be disposed of at this stage by directing the respondents to dispose of the pending representation dated 11-08-2025 addressed to the Deputy Commissioner (Home), Government of Manipur.

Mr. Niranjan Sanasam, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents, submits that the representation may be in the prescribed format.

Recording the submissions made at the Bar, the present writ petition is disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioners to submit a representation in the prescribed format before the Deputy Commissioner, Jiribam. The petitioners are permitted to submit a new representation to the Deputy Commissioner, Jiribam in the prescribed format within a period of one week and the competent authority shall consider the new representation and also the contents of the earlier representation dated 11-08-2025 and pass a speaking order as per rules and admissible scheme within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a fresh representation from the petitioners.

It is made clear that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

JUDGE Victoria NINGOM BAM VICTORIA Digitally signed by NINGOMBAM VICTORIA Date: 2026.03.13 17:34:04 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead