Manipur High Court

WP(C)/193/2026 of M/S Manipur Guard Service Vs Union of India and 7 Ors on 11 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 193 of 2026

Item No. 5-6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No. 193 of 2026 with

MC(WP(C) No. 202 of 2026

M/S Manipur Guard Service

…..Petitioner/s

- Versus –

Union of India & 7 Ors.

.... Respondent/s

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

12.03.2026

Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the petitioner.

By the present petition, the petitioner is one of the seven technically responsive bidders in terms of bid document dated 05.02.2026 for engagement of unarmed Private Security Guard for SAI Complex, Imphal West.

In the present writ petition, all the seven technically qualified bidders have quoted the same value and all are L1. However, the contract was awarded to respondent No. 3 and the same is challenged on various grounds. The prayer is for quashing the technical evaluation of respondent No. 3 and to cancel the award dated 02.03.2026 awarded to respondent No. 3.

Mr. Boboy Potsangbam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1 (Union of India) and respondent No. 2 (SAI), on instruction, submits that official respondents are contemplating for cancellation of the whole proceedings of NIT floated on 05.02.2026 along with corresponding proceeding and award dated 02.03.2026

granted in favour of respondent No. 3 and submits that writ petition may be disposed of at this stage.

Recording the submissions of learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2, writ petition is closed in view of the purported cancellation of the whole proceedings of the bid including awarded dated 02.03.2026. Misc. application is also closed.

It is clarified that this Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

JUDGE Kh. Joshua Maring

KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2026.03.13 12:21:18 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead