Manipur High Court

WP(C)/629/2025 of M/S K H Contractor and Supplier Vs State of Manipur and 2 Ors on 25 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

of 2025 Page 1 of 2 Item No. 29 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT

Item No. 29

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No. 629 of 2025

M/S K H Contractor and Supplier.

…Petitioner

- Versus -

State of Manipur & 2 Ors.

…Respondents

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

26-02-2026

Present Mr. L. Shashibhushan, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. L. Liya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. R.K. Emily, learned Dy. Government Advocate on behalf of Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents.

By the present petition, the petitioner approached this Court for release of payment for the work done by him for respondent No. 3/IDTRC. During the pendency of the writ petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits a letter dated 06-02-2026 written by the Executive Director (Technical), MSPDCL to the Director (Transport), Government of Manipur for verifying the estimate for installation of 20 Street Lights at IDTRC, Yaralpat executed by the petitioner. In pursuance to the letter dated 06-02-2026 submitted by the petitioner, the Director (Transport), Government of Manipur wrote a letter dated 25-02-2026 to the learned Government Advocate informing that the Department will take up necessary steps regarding the release of balance payment to the petitioner in terms of the verification report submitted by the Manipur State Power Distribution Company Limited (MSPDCL) and it is submitted that the verification has already been done. The two letters dated 06-02-2026 and 25-02-2026 are taken on record.

Mr. L. Shashibhushan, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that the writ petition may be disposed by directing the respondents to release the payment within the stipulated time.

Mrs. R.K. Emily, learned Dy. Government Advocate for the State respondents, submits that the payment may be released as per law, verification report and in terms of the rules applicable therein.

This Court has considered the materials on record. The writ petition is disposed of as prayed for by directing the respondents to release the amount in terms of the verification report done by the MSPDCL and as per law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Interim order, if any, merges with the final order.

JUDGE Victoria

NINGOM BAM VICTORIA Digitally signed by NINGOMBAM VICTORIA Date: 2026.02.27 10:40:27 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead