Manipur High Court
WP(C)/135/2020 of NINGTHAR SHANGLAI Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 ORS on 15 December 2025
30 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL W.P. (C) No. 135 of 2020
Item no. 30
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
W.P. (C) No. 135 of 2020
Ningthar Shanglai
… Petitioner
- Versus -
State of Manipur and 3 Ors.
… Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
16.12.2025
Heard Ms. R. Solem, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Th. Sukumar, learned GA for the State respondents.
The petitioner who is a Hd/Man of Chakama Village under Yairipok P.S. is aggrieved by 2(two) summon letters dated 28.08.2019 and 02.12.2019 issued by Range Forest Officer, Thoubal calling for explanation from him. It is alleged that the petitioner is an accused of illegal felling of trees and excavation of hill earth from the Gwarok Reserve Forest at Malom Jaliyanbi by order dated 27.08.2019 and village of the petitioner has been set apart by the State vide order dated 14.08.1979. It is also stated that the petitioner has submitted replies dated 10.09.2019 and 16.12.2019 to the show cause notices. It is submitted that both the representations are still pending.
The learned GA for the State respondents submits that the State respondents may be given some time to decide on the replies submitted by the petitioner to the show cause.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given an opportunity of being heard physically and liberty to submit fresh ground during the course of hearing. This Court has considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of challenge in the writ petition being summons issued to the petitioner, the writ +05'30'
petition is disposed of by directing the respondents to pass an appropriate order within 3(three) months upon the replies submitted by the petitioner. The petitioner may be given a personal hearing and liberty to place on record of additional facts and circumstances which may be necessary for disposal of the dispute.
With these observations, the W.P. (C) No. 135 of 2020 is disposed of.
This Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.
Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties through Whatsapp or any other available mode.
JUDGE
Thoiba