Manipur High Court
WP(C)/273/2025 of Khanotla Vashum alias Khanotla zimik Vs State of Manipur and another on 2 December 2025
of 2025 Page 1 of 2 Item No. 64 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT
Item No. 64
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 273 of 2025
Khanotla Vashum Alias Khanotla Zimik.
…Petitioner
- Versus -
State of Manipur & Anr.
…Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
03-12-2025
Present Mr. Lh. Decemhring, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Niranjan Sanasam learned Government Advocate for the State respondents through video conferencing.
It is submitted that the matter has been settled in mediation vide proceeding dated 28-11-2025. Mediation proceeding dated 28-11-2025 is reproduced hereinbelow:— “HIGH COURT MEDIATION CENTRE HIGH COUT OF MANIPUR ----
WP(C) No. 273 of 2025 Khanotal Vashum Alias Khanotla Zimil Vs State of Manipur & Anr
Settlement Agreement Imphal, 28th November, 2025
As directed by the Hon’ble High Court order dated 28.07.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 273 of 2025, all the parties from both the sides were present in mediation session on 04/08/2025, 19/08/2025, 29/08/25, 12/09/2025, NINGO MBAM VICTORI A Digitally signed by NINGOMBAM VICTORIA Date: 2025.12.03 16:38:36 +05'30'
18/09/2025, 13/10/2025 and 28/11/2025 agreed to the following terms and conditions to bring about an amicable solution to the above mentioned Writ Petition. The parties agreed to the following terms and conditions: That the 1st party, Khanotla Vashum Alias Khanotla Zimik (Petitioner) is represented by her eldest daughter Philamgam Vashum agrees to close the above mentioned Writ Petition, after coming to an understanding with the Respondent No. 2 represented by P. Duna Duo, SDO, Jesami herein referred as 2nd party. That, the Respondent No. 1 State of Manipur represented by the Commissioner/Secretary (Revenue), Imphal, Manipur has no objection with the settlement agreement between the 1st party and 2nd party. That, this agreement should be final and binding to all the parties concerned. In the light of the above terms, the mutual agreement was signed between the Petitioner and Respondents of WP(C) No. 273 of 2025 in the presence of the Mediator.
Philamgam Vashum Signature of the 1st Party
P. Duna Duo Signature of the 2nd Party Girija Jain, Mediator Imphal/Dated 28/11/2025”
It is submitted that the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at in the mediation proceeding.
This Court has gone through the mediation proceeding dated 28- 11-2025 and the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at in the mediation proceeding.
Any interim order merges with the final order.
JUDGE Victoria