Manipur High Court
WP(C)/354/2022 of SANABAM SONIA DEVI Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 4 ORS on 1 December 2025
HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No.354 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
65 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No.354 of 2022
Sanabam Sonia Devi … Petitioner -Versus- State of Manipur & 4 Ors … Respondents
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 2.12.2025
Present Ms.Anamika, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Niranjan, learned Government Advocate for respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5. None appears on behalf of respondent No.4.
By the present writ petition, the petitioner, wife of respondent No.4 approached this Court for cancellation of Arms Licence of respondent No.4 as she has been threatened by respondent No.4 on repeated occasion and she is afraid of her safety, life and liberty.
None appears on behalf of respondent No.4. However, respondent No.4 has filed counter affidavit denying the averments made in the writ petition.
Mr.S.Niranjan, learned Government Advocate draws attention of this Court to the counter affidavit of respondent No.3/Superintendent of Police, Imphal West and refers to para 8. It is stated that on 7.7.2022 a raid was made by personnel of Imphal West Police personnel and one .32 pistol having licence No.6099/IW issued by the District Magistrate, Imphal West, along with two magazines and gun licence were seized by police personnel and they are kept in the safe custody of Police.
Mr.S.Niranjan, learned Government Advocate submits that in view of subsequent development the writ petition may be disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for cancellation of gun licence.
This Court has considered the materials on record. As stated in the counter affidavit filed by the Superintendent of Police, Imphal West gun licence of .32 pistol allotted to respondent No.4 has already been in the custody of Imphal West Police, along with ammunition.
In the circumstance, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum for cancellation of gun licence, if so desires.
JUDGE
Priyojit
RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2025.12.03 16:17:09 +05'30'