Manipur High Court

MC(WP(C))/816/2025 of Tholung Beshang Vs State of Manipur and 3 Ors on 12 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No. 888 of 2025

Item No. 6-7

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No. 888 of 2025 with

MC(WP(C) No. 816 of 2025

Tholung Beshang

…..Petitioner/s

- Versus –

State of Manipur & 3 Ors.

.... Respondent/s

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

Order

13.11.2025

Heard Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. Rendy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned G.A. for official respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

petitioner, submits that by the present writ petition, the petitioner is challenging the appointment of respondent No. 4 as new Chief of Thamlapokpi Village, Chandel District vide order dated 21.04.2023 issued by the Sub Divisional Officer, Chandel.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner draws the attention of this Court to the order dated 20.10.2022 passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 1035 of 2015 wherein it has been held that the State Government has no power/authority or jurisdiction to declare a person as a Headman of a village and the appointment of a village Head by an order of State Government appointing Headman was quashed.

petitioner, refers to Section 3 of Manipur (Village Authorities in Hill Areas) Act, 1956 whereas it is provided that the village authority has to be elected body only and for removal and any dispute in the election of members of any village authority lies with the Deputy Commissioner under Sections 8 & 12 of the Act.

In the circumstances, the petitioner made a representation dated 27.10.2025 to the Deputy Commissioner, Chandel and also another similar representation dated 03.11.2025 to the Additional Chief Secretary/Secretary (TA & Hills), Government of Manipur for cancelling the appointment of respondent No. 4 as Chief of Thamlapokpi village, Chandel. It is submitted that representations are still pending with the authorities.

petitioner, submits that writ petition may be disposed of at this stage by directing the authority to decide the pending representation within a stipulated time.

Mrs.Ch. Sundari, learned G.A., submits that respondent No. 4 whose Chiefship has been challenged in the present writ petition has not been heard. However, she submits that the matter may be remanded to the authorities to decide the pending representations.

This Court has perused the materials on record, considered the submissions made at the bar and the provisions of the Act.

Sections 8 & 12 of the Act empower the Deputy Commissioner for removal and to decide election dispute of the members of the village authority.

In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of at this stage by directing the Deputy Commissioner, Chandel to decide the pending representation dated 27.10.2025 submitted by the petitioner as per law within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

This Court has not issued notice to respondent No. 4 whose appointment is sought to be challenged. Deputy Commissioner, Chandel is directed to issue notice to respondent No. 4 herein i.e. Mr. SK. Lovemol, Chief of Thamlapokpi Village, Chandel, P.O. & P.S. Pallel, Chandel before deciding the matter.

With this observation, writ petition is disposed of. Misc. application is also closed.

This Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

JUDGE

Kh. Joshua Maring

KH. JOSHUA MARING Digitally signed by KH. JOSHUA MARING Date: 2025.11.13 16:03:18 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead