Manipur High Court

Crl.M.C./43/2025 of Anjali Chettry Vs Officer in Charge, Kangpokpi Police Station on 9 November 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

167-169 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL Crl. M.C. No. 43 of 2025 with

Item no. 167-169

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

Crl. M.C. No. 43 of 2025 with

AB No. 23 of 2025 with

Crl. M.C. No. 28 of 2025

Anjali Chettry

… Applicant

- Versus -

Officer in Charge, Kangpokpi Police Station … Respondent B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

10.11.2025

Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel for the petitioner/ applicant and Mr. H. Samarjit, learned PP for the State respondent.

By the present application, the petitioner prays for leaving the State of Manipur for medical treatment/check up at Apollo Cancer Centres of Appollo Speciality Hospital, Chennai for a period of 30 days (one month) w.e.f. 11.11.2025 to 11.12.2025.

Vide order dated 05.08.2025 in AB No. 23 of 2025, this Court granted pre-arrest bail to the petitioner with the following conditions:

a) The petitioner shall furnish personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) with one surety (Govt. Employee) of the like amount.

b) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation.

c) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.

d) The petitioner shall not leave Manipur without leave of this Court. +05'30'

e) On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the respondent is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law.

It is submitted that ‘clause d)’ of the above conditions directed the petitioner not to leave Manipur without permission of this Court. In the circumstances, the present application is filed for taking permission and mandating report has been annexed.

Mr. H. Samarjit, learned PP submits that while granting permission, this Court may pass appropriate directions so that the applicant does not abscond.

This Court has perused the materials on record and the submissions made at the bar.

It is seen that the petitioner is a cancer patient and she requires regular medical treatment and for this purpose, she has to leave Manipur for Chennai for further treatment.

In the circumstances, the application is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to leave Manipur w.e.f. 11.11.2025 to 11.12.2025 subject to the conditions that when return to Manipur, she shall report to the I.O. of the case within 1(one) week and submit a copy of the same to this Court.

With these observations, the Crl. M.C. No. 43 of 2025 is allowed.

List the remaining cases on 15.12.2025.

Furnish a copy of this order to the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

JUDGE

Thoiba

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead