Manipur High Court

MC(WP(C))/604/2025 of North East Region Finservices Limited and Anr Vs North Eastern Development Finance Corporation Limited and 2 Ors on 16 October 2025

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL WP(C) No.648 of

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

132-133 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL

WP(C) No.648 of 2025 with MC (WP(C)) No.604 of 2025

North East Region Finservices Limited & Anr.

....Petitioners

-Versus-

North Eastern Dev Finance Corpn Ltd & Ors

....Respondents

BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.GUNESHWAR SHARMA 17.10.2025

Heard Mr.D.Senapati, learned counsel along with Mr.N.Anix, Mr.Annurann Chetia and Ms.Kavita T, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.K.Pradeep, learned counsel for the respondents.

By the present petition, petitioners approached this Court with a prayer for setting aside the impugned order dated 13.6.2025 passed by the Recovery Officer-II, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Guwahati.

When the matter was first listed on 25.8.2025, this Court issued limited notice as Mr.D.Senapati, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for two months’ time for payment of the balance amount due to the respondents. Mr.K.Pradeep, learned counsel for the respondent/bank have filed reply affidavit raising question of maintainability of the writ petition in the present form and also on merit, stating that enough time had been granted to the petitioner.

Mr.D.Senapati, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have not disputed the liability for payment to the respondents and are planning to pay the balance amount as soon some property of the petitioner is sold off and they are not getting proper buyer at the moment and prays for some time.

Considering the peculiar facts and circumstance of the case, without going to the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by giving one more months’ time from tomorrow, (18.10.2025) to the petitioners to make payment to the respondent/bank.

This Court does not express any opinion on the merit of the case.

Misc Case also stand disposed of.

Earlier interim order is merged with the final order.

JUDGE

Priyojit

RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Digitally signed by RAJKUMAR PRIYOJIT SINGH Date: 2025.10.27 16:50:24 +05'30'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead