Manipur High Court
WP(C)/259/2022 of T. KANMI AND 17 OTHERS Vs STATE OF MANIPUR AND 3 OTHERS on 13 October 2025
of 2022 Page 1 of 3 Item No. 153 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT
Item No. 153
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 259 of 2022
T. Kanmi & 17 Ors.
…Petitioner
- Versus -
State of Manipur & 3 Ors.
…Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
14-10-2025
Present Mr. Tungrei Ngakang, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Samarjit H., learned Government Advocate for State respondent Nos. 1, 3 & 4; and Ms. Julekha Khan, learned counsel for respondent No. 2.
As per mediation report, the parties have settled the matter vide proceedings of mediation dated 21-08-2025. Mediation proceedings are recorded as follows:— “To The Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court of Manipur, Maniputripukhri, Imphal.
Subject: Report for Mediation in connection with W.P. (C) No. 259 of 2022. [T. Kanmi & Ors. -Vs-State of Manipur & Ors.]
Sir, With reference to your Notification dated 18th August, 2025, I have conducted mediation with regard to the above referred case. In this regard, I am submitting the Report of Mediation. Mediation was held on 19-08-2025. During mediation the petitioners did not appear in person however represented by their counsel, respondent NINGOM BAM VICTORI A Digitally signed by NINGOMBAM VICTORIA Date: 2025.10.15 11:29:02 +05'30'
no. 1 by authorised official and remaining respondents represented by their counsel were present. The counsel for petitioners apprised that the relief sought for in the writ petition has already been complied with by the authority concern. Whereas, the respondent did not raise any objection to the submission of petitioners' counsel and requested the matter may be referred to the referral court for passing appropriate order by considering submission of the petitioners' counsel. I have prepared the submission of both the parties present in the mediation in another sheet and the parties have executed the same (Copy enclosed). It is therefore, informed you that the matter is settled amicably between the parties and requested the matter may be referred back to the Hon'ble High Court of Manipur for disposal of the case in terms of submission of the petitioners' counsel.
Dated/Imphal The 21st August, 2025
Yours sincerely,
Sd/- (H. Maipaksana) Mediator High Court Legal Services Committee”
“W.P.(C) NO. 259 of 2022 T. Kanmi & Others. -VERSUS- The state of Manipur & Others.
The prayer as sought for in the writ petition is to direct the respondents to provide the alternative way for the petitioners with a uniform wide of 15ft. and pay the compensation amount of Rs. 18,00,000/- (Rupees eighteen lakhs only) for causing irreparable loss and suffering to the petitioners due to the arbitrary, discriminatory, illegal and highhanded act with interest from the date of filing the writ petition.
The case has been referred to High Court Mediation Centre for mediation.
Mediation was held on 19-08-2025 at High Court Mediation Centre. During mediation the petitioners did not appear in person however represented by their counsel namely, Tungrie Ngakang, Advocate, Respondent No.
by authorized official namely, Lokeshor Brahmacharimayum (JS/LR), Respondent No. 3 and 4 represented by Deputy Government Advocate namely W. Niranjit Singh, Advocate and Respondent No. 2 represented by counsel namely Kh. Maria, Advocate Jr. to Kh. Tarunkumar, Sr. Advocate were present.
The counsel for petitioners submits that the relief sought for in the writ petition has already been complied with by the concerned authority. Whereas, the respondents have not raised any objection to the submission of the petitioner and requested the matter may be referred to the referral court for passing an appropriate order by considering the submission of the petitioner’s counsel. After recording the above statement of the parties, signatures of the parties have been put hereunder. Signature of petitioner’s counsel Tungrei Ngakang Signature of the Respondents
1. W. Niranjit Singh, Dy. GA
2. Lokeshor Brahmacharimayum
3. Kh. Maria, Jr. to Kh. Tarunkumar, Sr. Advocate”
Recording that the prayer sought for has already been complied with by the authority concerned, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at the mediation proceedings dated 21-08-2025.
JUDGE Victoria