Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/409/2026 of BALAJIED IAWBOR Vs THE KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ORS. on 11 September 2026

2026:MLHC:1015

No.04 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 409 of 2026 Date of Decision: 11.09.2026 Shri. Balajied Iawbor, S/o Smti. Mila Iawbor, R/o Majai, Hima Sohra, East Khasi Hills District. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong, Meghalaya,

Serial No.04

Supp. List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 409 of 2026

Date of Decision: 11.09.2026

Shri. Balajied Iawbor,

S/o Smti. Mila Iawbor,

R/o Majai, Hima Sohra,

East Khasi Hills District.

…Petitioner

-Versus-

1. The Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong, Meghalaya, represented by its Secretary.

2. The Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong, Meghalaya, represented by its Secretary.

3. The Executive Member, I/c Elaka Administration, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong.

4. The Acting Chief, Hima Sohra, Sohra Syiemship, East Khasi Hills District.

…Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. R.S.Malgniang, Adv.

Ms. W.L.Nongbri, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. H.L.Shangreiso, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. T.Dkhar, Adv.

Ms. D.Lyngdoh, Adv. for R 1-3.

Page 1 of 3

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. R.S.Malngiang, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Issue notice.

3. Mr. H.L.Shangreiso, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. T.Dkhar, learned counsel is present on behalf of the respondents No. 1-3, as such, no further notice is required on these respondents.

4. No notice to the respondent No. 4 presently.

5. The grievance of the writ petitioner as projected is with the cancellation and termination of his post as Acting Sordar of Majai, which he submits, is without an opportunity of hearing.

6. It is submitted by Mr. R.S.Malngiang, learned counsel for the petitioner that though a Political Appeal against the order of the respondent No. 4 removing him from office has been presented before the respondents No. 1-3, no interim orders were passed and the appeal is still pending consideration. He therefore prays that as he had not been given any opportunity to be heard, interim orders be issued.

Page 2 of 3

7. Mr. H.L.Shangreiso, learned Sr. counsel for the respondents No. 1-3, submits that the Political Appeal is still pending consideration before the respondent No. 2, and in fact, the matter is fixed on 29-09-2026 wherein the petitioner will get liberty to place his entire case.

8. On hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on examination of the materials on record, as it appears that the matter is pending consideration, the writ petition is premature and is disposed of, however, by directing the respondents to allow the petitioner to place all his grievances on the next date the Political Appeal is heard.

9. Writ petition accordingly stands closed and disposed of.

Judge

Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.09.11 17:32:19 IST Signature Not Verified

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead