Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/265/2026 of SOHIL S. SANGMA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 9 September 2026

Serial No. 56 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG W(C) No. 265 of 2026 Date of Decision: 09.09.2026 Shri Sohil S. Sangma, S/o Tenoti S. Sangma, R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Meghalaya represented by The Commissioner

Serial No. 56

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

W(C) No. 265 of 2026

Date of Decision: 09.09.2026

Shri Sohil S. Sangma,

S/o Tenoti S. Sangma,

R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District,

Meghalaya. …. Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. The State of Meghalaya represented by The Commissioner and Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. The Director of School Education and Literacy, Meghalaya, Shillong.

3. The Sub-Divisional Schools Education Officer, West Garo Hills District, Tura, Meghalaya

4. President of the Special Interim Managing Committee, Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya

5. Secretary of Special Interim Managing Committee, Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya

6. The Head master-cum-Secretary of Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.

7. Shri Sajan Ali, R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya-794104 … Respondent(s)

Page 1 of 2

__________________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.T. Sangma, Adv. with

Ms. G. Ch. Marak, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Ms. S. Bhattacharjee, GA (For R 1-3)

Mr. M. Sarma, Adv. with

Mr. S.R. Alom, Adv. (For R 5)

Ms. M. Rahman, Adv. (For R 7)

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. The writ petitioner had approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the result of the personal interview for the post of Chowkidar at Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya, and had also impugned the selection of the respondent No. 7.

2. As it is now reported by the learned counsel for the State respondents that the appointment of the respondent No. 7, has since been recalled and the petitioner has been appointed in his place, Mr. P.T.

Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition.

3. The prayer is allowed.

4. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of, on withdrawal. JUDGE

Meghalaya 09.09.2026 “V. Lyndem-AR-PS”

2026:MLHC:1000 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.09.09 18:34:41 IST Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead