Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/340/2026 of PDIANGHUN SHYLLA Vs STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. on 7 September 2026

2026:MLHC:983

No.30 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 340 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.09.2026 Smt. Pdianghun Shylla, W/o Shri. Clinton Lamin, Aged abour 28 years, Resident of H. No. 129, Diwon, Vill-Diwon, District: Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya – 793102. …Petitioner -Versus- 1.

Serial No.30

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 340 of 2026

Date of Decision: 07.09.2026

Smt. Pdianghun Shylla,

W/o Shri. Clinton Lamin,

Aged abour 28 years,

Resident of H. No. 129,

Diwon, Vill-Diwon,

District: Ri-Bhoi,

Meghalaya – 793102.

…Petitioner

-Versus-

1. State of Tamil Nadu through Cyber Crime Police Station, Keezhkuppam – 606301.

2. The Branch Manager, Meghalaya Rural Bank, Branch MRB Umden Branch, Ri-Bhoi District – 793102, Meghalaya.

3. The State of Meghalaya, through the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Home (Police) Department, Main Secretariat, Shillong, Meghalaya – 793 001.

4. The Officer-in-Charge, Nongpoh Police Station, District Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya – 793102.

…Respondents

Page 1 of 2

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.Thapa, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. P.Dey, Adv. for R 2.

Ms. A.D.Syiem, GA for R 3 & 4.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Mr. P.Dey, learned counsel has entered appearance today on behalf of the respondent No. 2, and Ms. A.D.Syiem, learned GA is present on behalf of the respondents No. 3 & 4, however, none is present on behalf of the respondent No. 1.

2. Mr. P.Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 today submits that the matter can be closed and the account of the writ petitioner, while keeping the lien amount of ₹6500/-, can be defreezed.

3. Mr. S.Thapa, learned counsel for the petitioner also concurs to the submissions of Mr. P.Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the account of the writ petitioner be defrozen, and only the lien amount of ₹6500/- be kept in abeyance.

5. As ordered above, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of.

Judge

2026:MLHC:983 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.09.07 17:30:30 IST Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead