Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/402/2025 of KIPPARSON K. SANGMA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS. on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.25 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 402 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.08.2026 1. Shri. Kipparson K. Sangma S/o Robendro D. Momin Resident of Baida P.O. Chotipara & P.S. Krishnai District, Goalpara Assam. ………. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of

Serial No.25

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 402 of 2025

Date of Decision: 21.08.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Shri. Kipparson K. Sangma

S/o Robendro D. Momin

Resident of Baida P.O. Chotipara &

P.S. Krishnai District, Goalpara Assam.

………. Petitioner

-Versus-

1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Government of Meghalaya Shillong.

2. The Director of Mass and Elementary

Education, Shillong Meghalaya.

3. The Sub-Divisional Schools Education

Officer, Ampati West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

4. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya

Personnel & AR(B) Department, East Khasi Hills Shillong.

………. Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. P. T. Sangma, Adv with

Ms. G. Ch. Marak, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. T. Yangi, B AAG with

Ms. R. Colney, GA.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Mrs. T. Yangi B, learned AAG assisted by Ms. R. Colney, learned GA for the respondents, has submitted that from the records it appears that the writ petitioner was appointed in the office of the Inspector of Schools and not in a District Council School, as perceived earlier, and as such the instant case stands on a different footing.

2. On this submission, Mr. P. T. Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh, on the revelation of new facts.

2. Prayer is allowed.

3. Matter accordingly, stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty as prayed.

4. This matter also stands segregated from other writ petitions which were listed together.

JUDGE Meghalaya 21.08.2026 “Tengmit”

2026:MLHC:925 Digitally signed by TENGMIT R MARAK Date: 2026.08.21 18:18:49 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead