Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/402/2025 of KIPPARSON K. SANGMA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS. on 21 August 2026
No.25 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 402 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.08.2026 1. Shri. Kipparson K. Sangma S/o Robendro D. Momin Resident of Baida P.O. Chotipara & P.S. Krishnai District, Goalpara Assam. ………. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of
Serial No.25
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 402 of 2025
Date of Decision: 21.08.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shri. Kipparson K. Sangma
S/o Robendro D. Momin
Resident of Baida P.O. Chotipara &
P.S. Krishnai District, Goalpara Assam.
………. Petitioner
-Versus-
1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Government of Meghalaya Shillong.
2. The Director of Mass and Elementary
Education, Shillong Meghalaya.
3. The Sub-Divisional Schools Education
Officer, Ampati West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
4. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya
Personnel & AR(B) Department, East Khasi Hills Shillong.
………. Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. P. T. Sangma, Adv with
Ms. G. Ch. Marak, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. T. Yangi, B AAG with
Ms. R. Colney, GA.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mrs. T. Yangi B, learned AAG assisted by Ms. R. Colney, learned GA for the respondents, has submitted that from the records it appears that the writ petitioner was appointed in the office of the Inspector of Schools and not in a District Council School, as perceived earlier, and as such the instant case stands on a different footing.
2. On this submission, Mr. P. T. Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner, prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh, on the revelation of new facts.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Matter accordingly, stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty as prayed.
4. This matter also stands segregated from other writ petitions which were listed together.
JUDGE Meghalaya 21.08.2026 “Tengmit”
2026:MLHC:925 Digitally signed by TENGMIT R MARAK Date: 2026.08.21 18:18:49 IST Signature Not Verified