Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./188/2026 of HASDINGWELL LYNGDOH Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 19 August 2026
2026:MLHC:908
No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 188 of 2026 Date of Decision: 19.08.2026 Shri. Hasdingwell Lyngdoh Son of Shri. Bralli Marngar (Convict presently serving sentence in Correctional Home & Prisons, Shillong)., Aged about 39 years, Permanent Resident of
Serial No. 01
Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 188 of 2026
Date of Decision: 19.08.2026
Shri. Hasdingwell Lyngdoh
Son of Shri. Bralli Marngar (Convict presently serving sentence in Correctional Home &
Prisons, Shillong).,
Aged about 39 years,
Permanent Resident of Nongrim-
Mawkhar (Jaidoh) Village,
P.S. Nongstoin, West Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
.…….. Appellant
-Vs-
State of Meghalaya through the
Commissioner & Secretary to the
Government of Meghalaya,
Department of Home (Police),
Civil Secretariat, Shillong.
……… Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Applicant(s)
:
Ms. P. Chettri, LAC.
For the Respondent(s)
:
Mr. H. Abraham, Addl. PP.
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
Page 1 of 3
in press:
Yes/No
Per W. Diengdoh, (J):
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Ms. P. Chettri, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 23.08.2023 and related order of sentence dated 25.08.2023 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), West Khasi Hills District, Nongstoin in Special (POCSO) Case No. 15/2022, whereby, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20(twenty) years with fine of ₹ 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) only, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment of 3(three) months for an offence punishable under Section 6 POCSO Act. For an offence punishable under Section 10 POCSO Act, the applicant is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5(five) years with fine of ₹ 5000/- (Rupees five thousand) only, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment of 1(one) month, and for an offence punishable under Section 506 Part-I IPC, the applicant is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1(one) year with fine of ₹ 1000/- (Rupees one thousand) only, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment of 15(fifteen) days.
2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 1028 days has
Page 2 of 3
occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, being an uneducated person and hailing from a poor family, has no means to file an appeal or to engage a private counsel, as such, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Thereafter, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted.
3. Mr. H. Abraham, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.
4. On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 1028 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.
6. Misc. Case disposed of.
(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)
Judge Judge
Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.08.19 17:30:12 IST Signature Not Verified
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…