Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/213/2025 of MOIRA ROSE KAHIT Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 2 ORS. on 17 August 2026
Serial No. 50 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 213 of 2025 Date of Decision: 17.08.2026 Smti Moira Rose Kahit, W/o Shri Danny Shylla, R/o Nongrim Hills, Shilong Meghalaya … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Meghalaya represented by The Commissioner &
Serial No. 50
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 213 of 2025
Date of Decision: 17.08.2026
Smti Moira Rose Kahit,
W/o Shri Danny Shylla,
R/o Nongrim Hills, Shilong
Meghalaya
… Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya represented by The Commissioner & Secretary Department of Homes, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong Meghalaya.
3. The Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong
… Respondent(s)
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. Gurung, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, GA
2026:MLHC:892
__________________________________________________________ i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press: (ORAL)
1. Though Mr. R. Gurung, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to amend the writ petition due to subsequent developments, which has resulted in the dismissal of the writ petitioner. In the considered view of this Court, justice will be better served if a fresh writ petition is preferred.
2. Mr. R. Gurung, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty to file afresh.
3. The same is not objected by Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, learned GA for the respondents.
4. Accordingly, the matter stands closed on withdrawal, however with liberty as prayed. JUDGE
Meghalaya 17.08.2026 “V. Lyndem-AR-PS”
2026:MLHC:892 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.08.17 15:46:14 IST Signature Not Verified