Meghalaya High Court

Crl.Petn./64/2022 of ISLAM HOQUE CHOUDHURY Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 3 ORS. on 14 August 2026

2026:MLHC:887

of 3 HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn. No. 64 of 2022 Date of order: 14.08.2026 Islam Hoque Choudhury ...Petitioner - versus - 1. The State of Meghalaya duly represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. Officer-in-charge, Phulbari Police Station, West Garo

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.Petn. No. 64 of 2022

Date of order: 14.08.2026

Islam Hoque Choudhury

...Petitioner

- versus -

1. The State of Meghalaya duly represented by the Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. Officer-in-charge, Phulbari Police Station, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

3. I/C District School Education Officer (Informant/ Complainant) West Garo Hills, Tura, Meghalaya.

4. Abdus Salam Sk. ...Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. H.L. Shangreiso, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. T. Dkhar, Adv.

For the Respondents : Mr. N.D. Chullai, AAG with

Ms R. Colney, GA [R1-3]

Ms. M. Rahman, Adv. [R4]

i) Whether approved for No

reporting in Law journals etc.:

ii) Whether approved for publication No

in press:

Serial No. 02 Supplementary List

Page 1 of 3

JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble, the Chief Justice) (Oral)

By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR dated 09.04.2021 registered with the Phulbari Police Station and consequently, the charge-sheet filed in the said FIR and also the criminal proceeding, i.e., GR Case No. 40 of 2022 pending before the JMFC, West Garo Hills.

2. Mr. N.D. Chullai, learned AAG, on instructions submits that the petitioner has also filed a criminal revision application, being Criminal Revision No. 5 of 2025 before the learned Sessions Judge at Tura against the order dismissing the petitioner’s application seeking his discharge from the said case and the revision application is pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Tura.

3. In this view of the matter, since the revision application, filed by the petitioner is pending before the learned Sessions Judge, Tura, this Court is not inclined to entertain the aforesaid petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.

Page 2 of 3

4. Needless to state that, the learned Sessions Judge to decide the pending revision application on its own merits uninfluenced by the disposal of the aforesaid petition. It is made clear that this petition is being disposed of only having regard to the fact, that the petitioner has filed a revision application, which is pending for hearing before the learned Sessions Judge, Tura.

5. Needless also to state that, all contentions of all parties are kept open.

6. The petition is, accordingly disposed of.

7. All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(Revati Mohite Dere)

Chief Justice

Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2026.08.14 19:27:06 IST Signature Not Verified

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead