Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/338/2026 of MILSON SANGMA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Serial No. 20 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 338 of 2026 Date of Decision: 13.08.2026 Shri. Milson Sangma S/o Aynal Hoque R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya :::Petitioner -Vs- 1. The State of Meghalaya represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, to the

Serial No. 20

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 338 of 2026

Date of Decision: 13.08.2026

Shri. Milson Sangma

S/o Aynal Hoque

R/o Rajabala, West Garo Hills District,

Meghalaya

:::Petitioner

-Vs-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Meghalaya represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, to the Government of Meghalaya, Education Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong

2. The Director of School Education and Literacy Meghalaya, Shillong

3. The District School Education Officer, West Garo Hills District, Tura, Meghalaya

4. President/Chairman of the Adhoc Managing Committee, Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya

5. Secretary of Adhoc Managing Committee, Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya

6. The Head master-cum-Secretary of Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya

7. Principal of Rajabala Higher Secondary School, West Garo Hills, Meghalaya

:::Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. P.T. Sangma, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. N.G. Shylla, Sr. GA with

Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, GA.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Yes/No Oral:

Mr. P.T. Sangma, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.

Prayer is allowed.

Accordingly, writ petition stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however with liberty as prayed.

Judge

Meghalaya 13.08.2026 “D.Thabah-PS”

Digitally signed by DARIHUN THABAH Date: 2026.08.13 15:39:19 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead