Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/362/2026 of RAYONOLD KHARKAMNI Vs JAMES P.K. SANGMA AND ORS. on 12 August 2026
Serial No. 42 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP (C) No. 362 of 2026 Date of Decision: 12.08.2026 Sri Rayonold Kharkamni, Honorary Secretary, Meghalaya Cricket Association, Mawroh, Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya 793102 ….Petitioner(s) Versus 1.Shri James P.K. Sangma, President,
Serial No. 42
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP (C) No. 362 of 2026
Date of Decision: 12.08.2026
Sri Rayonold Kharkamni,
Honorary Secretary,
Meghalaya Cricket Association,
Mawroh, Ri-Bhoi,
Meghalaya 793102
….Petitioner(s)
Versus
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shri James P.K. Sangma, President, Meghalaya Cricket Association, J.N. Sport Complex, Polo Ground, Shillong, Meghalaya.
2. The State of Meghalaya represented by its Commissioner and Secretary, Department of Sports & Youth Affairs, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong
3. Board of Control for Cricket of India (BCCI) Represented by its President Shri Mithun Manhas, Cricket Centre, Wankhede Stadium, ‘D’ Road, Churchgate, Mumbai-400020, Maharashtra
…. Respondent(s)
2026:MLHC:869
__________________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Rao, Sr. Adv. with Dr. N. Mozika, Sr. Adv.
Ms. M. Myrchiang, Adv. (For R 1)
Mr. A. Kumar, AG (For R 2)
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press: (ORAL)
1. Mr. S. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to file afresh, if so advised.
2. The same is not objected by the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however with liberty as prayed.
JUDGE
Meghalaya 12.08.2026 “V. Lyndem-AR-PS”
2026:MLHC:869 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.08.12 18:39:26 IST Signature Not Verified