Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./176/2026 of TREILANG SYIEM Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 12 August 2026
2026:MLHC:875
No. 07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 176 of 2026 Date of Decision: 12.08.2026 Shri. Treilang Syiem, Son of Shri. Krom Shadap, (Convict presently serving sentence in Correctional Home & Prisons, Nongpoh) Resident of Diwon Umden Village, Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh,
Serial No. 07
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 176 of 2026
Date of Decision: 12.08.2026
Shri. Treilang Syiem,
Son of Shri. Krom Shadap,
(Convict presently serving sentence in
Correctional Home & Prisons, Nongpoh)
Resident of Diwon Umden Village,
Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh, Meghalaya.
.…….. Applicant
-Vs-
State of Meghalaya through the
Commissioner & Secretary to the
Government of Meghalaya,
Department of Home (Police),
Civil Secretariat, Shillong.
……… Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Applicant(s)
:
Ms. N.M. Kharshemlang, LAC.
For the Respondent(s)
:
Mr. J. Thabah, GA.
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No
Page 1 of 3
Per W. Diengdoh, (J):
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Ms. N.M. Kharshemlang, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment and related order of sentence dated 18.03.2026 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Special (POCSO) Case No. 11 of 2015, whereby, he was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20(twenty) years with fine of ₹ 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) only, and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment of 5(five) months for an offence punishable under Section 6 POCSO Act. The applicant is also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5(five) years with fine of ₹ 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) only, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment of 1(one) month for an offence punishable under Section 8 POCSO Act.
2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 80 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, lacking financial capacity, has no means to file an appeal or to engage a private counsel. As such, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Thereafter, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay
Page 2 of 3
be condoned and the appeal be admitted.
3. Mr. J. Thabah, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.
4. On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 80 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.
6. Misc. Case disposed of.
(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)
Judge Judge
Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.08.12 18:59:33 IST Signature Not Verified
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…