Meghalaya High Court

Crl.M.C./107/2026 of SALSRANG D. SANGMA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 3 August 2026

2026:MLHC:811

No. 01 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 107 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.08.2026 Shri. Salsrang D. Sangma Aged about 28 years. S/o. Shri Honiar R Marak, R/o. Banchigittim, Cherangre, P.S. Tura. West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. … Accused/Appellant - Versus -

Serial No. 01

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.M.C. No. 107 of 2026

Date of Decision: 03.08.2026

Shri. Salsrang D. Sangma

Aged about 28 years.

S/o. Shri Honiar R Marak,

R/o. Banchigittim, Cherangre,

P.S. Tura. West Garo Hills District,

Meghalaya.

… Accused/Appellant

- Versus -

1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Secretary Home Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. Shri. Jogen Ch Marak Aged about 54 years, S/o. Lt. Jangma M. Sangma R/o. Banchigittim, Cherangre, P.S Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

3. Smti. Bensila A Sangma Aged about 56 years W/o. Shri. Jogen Ch Marak, R/o. Banchigittim, Chrangre, P.S Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

… Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge

Page 1 of 3

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, GA

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication

in press:

Yes/No ORDER (ORAL)

1. Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that this instant application has been filed with a prayer for condonation of delay of 231 days in filing the related appeal, the ground being that the applicant/appellant on being convicted by the court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), West Garo Hills District, Tura, in Special POCSO Case No. 28 of 2020 could not approach this Court within the stipulated period due to financial constraint and finally after exhausting all means was able to engage a counsel which is done so now. It is prayed that this application may be allowed, delay of 231 days may be condoned.

2. Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, learned GA appears for the State respondent and has no objection to the prayer of the applicant.

3. We have considered the submission and on perusal of the pleadings made in this application, this Court is persuaded to allow the prayer made. The delay as stated is hereby condoned.

Page 2 of 3

4. Accordingly, the delay of 231 days in preferring the related appeal is hereby condoned.

5. Registry to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1(one) week.

6. Crl. Misc. Case is disposed of. (B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh) Judge Judge

Meghalaya 03.08.2026 “Tiprilynti–PS”

2026:MLHC:811-DB Digitally signed by TIPRILYNTI KHARKONGOR Date: 2026.08.03 19:02:34 IST Signature Not Verified

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead