Meghalaya High Court

Crl.Petn./22/2026 of CLEOPHAS B. SYIEM AND ANR. Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. on 21 July 2026

2026:MLHC:744

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn. No. 22 of 2026 Date of order: 21.07.2026 1. Shri. Cleophas B. Syiem 2. Shri. Dipul Ryntathiang ....Petitioners - versus - 1. The State of Meghalaya represented by Public Prosecutor. 2. Smti. Asha Wallang, resident of Mawsmai Village, 11th Mile,

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.Petn. No. 22 of 2026

Date of order: 21.07.2026

1. Shri. Cleophas B. Syiem

2. Shri. Dipul Ryntathiang ....Petitioners

- versus -

1. The State of Meghalaya represented by Public Prosecutor.

2. Smti. Asha Wallang, resident of Mawsmai Village, 11th Mile, Nongpoh, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya.

3. The Officer-In-Charge/P.I. Khanapara Police Station, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya. ....Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioners : Mrs. B.S. Goyal, Adv.

Mr. S. Thapa, Adv.

For the Respondents : Mrs N.G. Shylla, PP with

Ms S. Kh. Nongrum, GA

By this petition, the petitioners are essentially seeking quashing of the show-cause notice issued to them in connection with the Khanapara P.S. Case No. 18(03)/2026 and, consequently, the investigation carried out by the said Khanapara Police Station.

Serial No. 03 Daily List 2026:MLHC:744

Page 1 of 2

2. Mrs. N.G. Shylla, learned PP, informs this Court that investigation is complete and charge-sheet has been filed. She submits that during the course of investigation, statements have been recorded and some articles have been seized.

3. In view of the statement made by the learned PP, Mrs N.G. Shylla, learned counsel for the petitioners does not press this petition since the reliefs sought in the petition do not survive. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

4. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the investigation carried out by the Police and as such, all contentions of all parties, on merits are kept open.

5. Needless to state, that the petitioners are always at liberty to file appropriate proceeding, as is maintainable in law, before the appropriate forum.

(Revati Mohite Dere)

Chief Justice

2026:MLHC:744 Digitally signed by SYLVANA LIZ KHARBHIH Date: 2026.07.21 18:40:29 IST Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead