Meghalaya High Court

MC(WPC)/203/2026 of THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, MEGHALAYA ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED (MeECL) AND ANR. Vs MATTIE SHIRA AND ORS. on 16 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Serial No. 06 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(WPC) No. 203 of 2026 In WP(C) No. 168 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.07.2026 1. The Managing Director, Meghalaya Energy Corporation Limited (MeECL), Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya 2. The Deputy Chief

Serial No. 06

Supplementary List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

MC(WPC) No. 203 of 2026

In WP(C) No. 168 of 2025

Date of Decision: 16.07.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Managing Director, Meghalaya Energy Corporation Limited (MeECL), Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

2. The Deputy Chief Administrative Officer, MeECL, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

:::Applicant/Petitioner

-Vs-

1. Shri. Mattie Shira Norma/Headman of Rongkandi Rongkhandigiri, Nongalbibra, P.O & P.S Nongalbibra, South Garo Hills District Meghalaya & 173 Ors.

:::Writ Petitioner/Respondent

2. State of Meghalaya, Represented by its Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

3. The Deputy Commissioner, Baghmara South Garo Hills District, Meghalaya

:::Proforma Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Ms. O.A.I. Bang, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. P.T. Sangma, Adv.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press:

Yes/No Oral:

This is an application for modification of the order dated 07.05.2026, passed by this Court in Misc. Case No. 123 of 2026, arising out of WP(C) No. 168 of 2025.

Ms. O.A.I. Bang, learned counsel for the applicant submits that inadvertently the prayer for liberty to file afresh was not made, though in sum and substance, the matter has been withdrawn to allow for correction of certain defects.

Mr. P.T. Sangma, learned counsel for the respondent/Opposite Party (Petitioner in the main case) has no objection.

In this view of the matter, the order dated 07.05.2026, is modified to the extent that liberty be granted to the applicant to put in a fresh application.

Matter accordingly is allowed and disposed of.

Judge Meghalaya 16.07.2026 “D.Thabah-PS”

Digitally signed by DARIHUN THABAH Date: 2026.07.16 15:47:19 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead