Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/46/2026 of NURUL AMIN KHANDOKAR Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 8 ORS. on 14 July 2026
No.10 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 46 of 2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 Shri Nurul Amin Khandokar son of (L) Nazrul Islam Khandokar, resident of Tosilderpara P.O & PS Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State
Serial No.10
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 46 of 2026
Date of Decision: 14.07.2026
Shri Nurul Amin Khandokar
son of (L) Nazrul Islam Khandokar,
resident of Tosilderpara P.O & PS Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Meghalaya represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya Personnel & Admv. Reforms (B) Department, Meghalaya, Shillong.
3. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Health & Family Welfare Department, Meghalaya, Shillong
4. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Finance (Pension Cell) Department, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong.
5. The Director of Health Services (MI), Meghalaya, Shillong.
6. The District Medical & Health Officer, West Garo Hills, Tura.
7. The District Medical and Health Officer, South West Garo Hills, Ampati.
8. The Treasury Officer, Ampati District Treasury, South West Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
9. The Principal Accountant General (A&E) Meghalaya, Shillong.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.A.Sheikh, Adv.
Mr. M.R.Marak, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Ms. S.Bhattacharjee, GA for R1-8.
Ms. E.B.Passah, Adv. for R 9.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, the Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Personnel & Admv. Reforms (B) Department, the matter can be closed.
2. Ms. S.Bhattacharjee, learned GA for the State respondents has also submitted that the Cabinet in its meeting held on 30-06-2026, was pleased to approve the proposal of regularisation, and the same has also been reflected in the affidavit.
3. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, and the affidavit filed by the respondent No. 2, nothing remains for consideration and the writ petition is closed and disposed of.
4. It is expected that the entire exercise should be completed preferably within a period of four months.
Judge
Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.14 18:19:55 IST Signature Not Verified