Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/313/2026 of BLOOMBERG WAHLANG Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 14 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.05 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 313 of 2026 Date of Decision: 14.07.2026 1. Shri. Bloomberg Wahlang. S/o. (L) Rev. Gerson Lyngdoh R/o. Patharkhmah Village P.S. Nongpoh Ri Bhoi District, Meghalaya. ………. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of

Serial No.05

Supplementary

List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 313 of 2026

Date of Decision: 14.07.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Shri. Bloomberg Wahlang.

S/o. (L) Rev. Gerson Lyngdoh

R/o. Patharkhmah Village

P.S. Nongpoh

Ri Bhoi District,

Meghalaya.

………. Petitioner

-Versus-

1. The State of Meghalaya,

Represented by the Chief Secretary to

the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. The Deputy Commissioner,

Ri Bhoi District, Nongpoh, Meghalaya.

3. Executive Magistrate

Ri Bhoi District, Nongpoh

Meghalaya.

4. The Officer-In-Charge,

Patharkhmah Police Station,

Ri Bhoi District,

Meghalaya.

5. Smti. Wansalan Lyngdoh,

D/o. (L) Bisho Singh

R/o. Patharkhmah Village

Ri Bhoi District,

Meghalaya.

………. Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s)

: Mr. K. V. Kharlyngdoh, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Ms. A. D. Syiem, GA for R 1-4.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Heard Mr. K. V. Kharlyngdoh, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Ms. A. D. Syiem, learned GA, is present on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

3. No notice be necessary for the respondent No. 5.

4. It appears from the submissions and from the materials placed that the petitioner is seeking a direction that the Executive Magistrate, respondent No. 3, of the Ri Bhoi District, Nongpoh, afford the writ petitioner a fair hearing in Legal Heirship Case No. 2 of 2026, which is pending adjudication.

5. Though, learned counsel for the petitioner, has attempted to make out grounds to warrant interference, in the considered view of this Court the writ petition is premature as the matter is still seized by the concerned court/authority.

6. In view of this matter, at this stage the petition is not entertained. Needless to add, in any forum it is expected that adequate opportunity be granted to the parties who appear before it to present their case.

7. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of.

JUDGE Meghalaya 14.07.2026 “Tengmit”

2026:MLHC:714 Digitally signed by TENGMIT R MARAK Date: 2026.07.14 18:50:43 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead