Meghalaya High Court

Crl.M.C./130/2026 of HAMRITH R. MARAK Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 13 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 130 of 2026 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 Shri Hamrith R. Marak, Aged about 34 years Son of Shri. Nolesh Ch. Sangma, Resident of Balsrigittim, Chokpot, P.O & P.S Chokpot, South Garo Hills District West Garo Hills

Serial No. 07

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.M.C. No. 130 of 2026

Date of Decision: 13.07.2026

Shri Hamrith R. Marak,

Aged about 34 years

Son of Shri. Nolesh Ch. Sangma,

Resident of Balsrigittim, Chokpot,

P.O & P.S Chokpot, South Garo Hills

District West Garo Hills

…Applicant

-Versus-

State of Meghalaya represented by the

Commissioner & Secretary to the Department of Home (Police)

Government of Meghalaya, Shillong-793001

…Respondent

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)

: Mr. M. Sharma, Legal Aid Counsel

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. R. Gurung, GA

i)

Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.:

ii)

Whether approved for publication

in press:

Yes/No

ORDER (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. M. Sharma, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal against the judgment and order dated 25.06.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge 2026:MLHC:701

(POCSO), West Garo Hills, Tura in POCSO Case No. 08 of 2017. However, a delay of 683 days has occurred while preferring the related appeal.

2. The learned Legal Aid Counsel has also submitted that he received the brief regarding the instant accused person belatedly which led to the delay of 683 days in preferring the related appeal and has therefore filed this instant application for condonation of the same.

3. The learned Legal Aid Counsel prays that the delay may be condoned to allow the applicant in preferring the related appeal.

4. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appears for the State respondent and has no objection to the prayer made.

5. On consideration of the prayer made, this Court is inclined to allow this application on being satisfied that the ground cited contain sufficient cause.

6. Accordingly, the delay of 683 days in preferring the related appeal is hereby condoned.

7. Registry to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1(one) week.

8. Misc. Case disposed of. Judge Meghalaya 13.07.2026 “Tiprilynti–PS” 2026:MLHC:701 Digitally signed by TIPRILYNTI KHARKONGOR Date: 2026.07.13 19:00:00 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead