Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/356/2025 of SUBROTHO G. MARAK Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 5 ORS. on 7 July 2026
No.53 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 356 of 2025 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 Shri. Subrotho G. Marak, S/o (L) Sylvester M. Sangma, R/o Mendipathar, P.O. & P.S Mendipathar, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya,
Serial No.53
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 356 of 2025
Date of Decision: 07.07.2026
Shri. Subrotho G. Marak,
S/o (L) Sylvester M. Sangma,
R/o Mendipathar, P.O. & P.S Mendipathar, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya, represented by the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. Deputy Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong, Meghalaya.
3. Director of Higher and Technical Education, Meghalaya, Shillong.
4. The Governing Body, Mendipathar College, Mendipathar, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
5. The Principal, Mendipathar College, Mendipathar, North Garo Hills, Meghalaya.
6. Shri. Rakban G. Momin, S/o Allindro Sangma, R/o Nisangram, P.O. Nisangram, District-Goalpara, Assam.
…Respondents
2026:MLHC:670
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.A.Sheikh, Adv.
Mr. L.N.Arengh, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. H.Abraham, GA for R 1-3.
Ms. N.Lamare, Adv. for R 4.
Mr. T.M.Marak, Adv. for R 5.
Mr. S.Deb, Adv. for R 6.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. S.A.Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to certain developments wherein the Governing Body Resolution dated 21-02- 2025 has come to light, he prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this instant writ petition, however, with liberty to file afresh.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Writ petition accordingly stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with liberty as prayed.
Judge
2026:MLHC:670 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.07 17:06:45 IST Signature Not Verified