Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/286/2026 of TOBIUS TIEWDOP Vs KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL (KHADC) AND ORS. on 6 July 2026
No.32 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 286 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 Shri. Tobius Tiewdop Secretary, Shella Village Dorbar Son of W. Ksanlah Resident of Nongnong, Shella East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. Khasi Hills
Serial No.32
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 286 of 2026
Date of Decision: 06.07.2026
Shri. Tobius Tiewdop
Secretary, Shella Village Dorbar
Son of W. Ksanlah
Resident of Nongnong, Shella
East Khasi Hills District,
Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council (KHADC) Represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, Shillong, Meghalaya.
2. Mr. Satish Roy Youroin Wahadar, Shella Village, Shella Confederacy, Meghalaya.
3. Shri. Readerforce Saruba, Headman, Shella Village Shella Confederacy, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.Thapa, Adv.
Mr. T.C.S.Lama, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Ms. L.Myrchiang, Adv. vice
Ms. P.S.Nongbri, Adv. for R 1.
Mr. S.Sen, Adv. for R 3. 2026:MLHC:658
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. The Minutes of the meeting which was convened on 26-06-2026, has been produced by the learned counsel for the respondent No. 3. A copy in vernacular as well as a translated copy has been provided.
2. A perusal of the Minutes shows that the meeting only resolved to constitute a committee to identify appropriate measures for restoring peace and tranquillity in the village.
3. This Court notes that the instant writ petition was filed by the writ petitioner questioning the convening of the meeting on the apprehension that in the said meeting, his removal would be discussed or action taken upon the same.
4. As it appears that his fears are unfounded, the writ petition is closed and disposed of.
5. Copy of the Minutes is taken on board and made part of the record.
Judge
2026:MLHC:658 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.06 15:52:01 IST Signature Not Verified