Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/213/2026 of HENJENSON D. SANGMA Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 6 July 2026
No.26 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 213 of 2026 Date of Decision: 06.07.2026 Shri. Henjenson D. Sangma, S/o. Inding R. Marak, R/o Nangapa Koksi Songma, P.O. Songsak, P.S. Dagal Apal East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of
Serial No.26
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 213 of 2026
Date of Decision: 06.07.2026
Shri. Henjenson D. Sangma,
S/o. Inding R. Marak,
R/o Nangapa Koksi Songma,
P.O. Songsak, P.S. Dagal Apal
East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya Represented by its Commissioner & Secretary, Community & Rural Development, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Director, Community & Rural Development, Meghalaya, Shillong.
3. The Joint Director, Community & Rural Development, Meghalaya, Shillong.
4. The Deputy Commissioner, Nort Garo Hills District, Resubelpara.
5. The Block Development Officer (BDO), Kharkutta Development Block, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
6. The Financial Advisor (FA), I/c Community & Rural Development Department, Meghalaya, Shillong.
7. The Finance & Accounts Officer (FAO) Directorate of Community & Rural Development, Shillong, Meghalaya.
8. The Treasury Officer, Treasury Office, Resubelpara, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
9. The Accountant General (A&E), Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. A.G.Momin, Adv.
Ms. L.D.Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. H.Abraham, GA for R 1-8.
None for R 9.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Though Mr. H.Abraham, learned GA for the respondents No. 1-8, has submitted that he has just received instructions and affidavit has been prepared, however, Mr. A.G.Momin, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous as the writ petitioner has since received all his retirement benefits.
2. Accordingly, on these submissions, the writ petition stands closed and disposed of.
Judge
Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.06 15:51:08 IST Signature Not Verified