Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/195/2024 of PAULINA R. MARAK Vs THE GARO HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND 2 ORS. on 1 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No. 24 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 195 of 2024 Date of Decision: 01.07.2026 1. Smti. Paulina R. Marak D/o George Ch. Marak R/o Upper Babupara, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. ...Petitioners -Versus- 1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, represented by

Serial No. 24

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 195 of 2024

Date of Decision: 01.07.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Smti. Paulina R. Marak

D/o George Ch. Marak

R/o Upper Babupara, West Garo Hills

District, Meghalaya.

...Petitioners

-Versus-

1. The Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, represented by its Secretary, Executive Committee, West Garo Hills, Tura.

2. The Chief Executive Member of Garo Hills Autonomous District Council Tura.

3. The Principal Secretary to the Executive Committee Garo Hills Autonomous District Council Tura.

…Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. P.T.Sangma, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. S.Dey, Adv.

Ms. N.Lamare, Adv.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. The writ petitioner who was released from service from the post of LDA Water Works Department under the Garo Hills Autonomous District Council on 19-04-2021, is before this Court seeking directions for release of arrear salary for the period that she had served.

2. In the course of the proceedings, Mr. P.T.Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner had produced an office order dated 02-06-2025, whereby the respondents had already sanctioned a sum of ₹5,42,268/- being the arrears payable to the writ petitioner.

3. Mr. P.T.Sangma, learned counsel submits that the only limited prayer of the writ petitioner is for release of the sanctioned amount as per the office order dated 02-06-2025.

4. Mr. S.Dey, learned counsel for the respondents submits that instructions have been received and the arrears have occurred due to the revision of pay scale of the petitioner when she was in service, and that he has no quarrel for release of the amount sanctioned.

5. Accordingly, in view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the respondents are directed to release the arrear amounting to ₹5,42,268/- to the writ petitioner within a period of two months from today. It is made clear that no interest is allowed on the said payment.

6. With the above direction, the writ petition is closed and disposed of.

Judge

Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.07.01 18:25:39 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead