Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/274/2026 of M/S RONAK HARDWARE Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. on 26 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.04 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 274 of 2026 Date of Decision: 26.06.2026 M/s. Ronak Hardware A proprietorial firm having its registered Office at 29A Cantonment, Near Anjalee Cinema Hall, Anjalee, Shillong-793001 and Represented by its proprietor Smti. Pinky

Serial No.04

Supp. List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 274 of 2026

Date of Decision: 26.06.2026

M/s. Ronak Hardware

A proprietorial firm having its registered Office at 29A Cantonment, Near Anjalee Cinema Hall, Anjalee, Shillong-793001 and Represented by its proprietor Smti. Pinky Agarwala, aged about 48 years, wife of Bhagwati Agarwala, resident of Opposite Tender Child School, Barapathar, Shillong – 793002, Meghalaya.

…Petitioner

-Versus-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Government of India, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi-110011.

2. The Central Public Works Department (CPWD), Represented by the Director General, Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi – 110011.

3. The Chief Engineer, Central Public Works Department (CPWD),

North Eastern Zone, Cleve Colony,

Dhankheti, Shillong – 793 003, Meghalaya.

…Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. M.Nath, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. D.J.Kapil, Adv.

Mr. M.Nath, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Dr. N.Mozika, DSGI with

Ms. M.Myrchiang, Adv.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Dr. N.Mozika, learned DSGI assisted by Ms. M.Myrchiang, learned counsel for the respondents today submits that the matter has since been rendered infructuous in view of the Corrigendum issued by the respondents, wherein the condition requiring 5 years of having an office in the NE region has been reduced to 3 years.

2. Mr. M.Nath, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. D.J.Kapil, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in this view of this matter, the writ petition may be closed as he has since become an eligible bidder.

3. Copy of the Corrigendum is taken on board and made part of the record.

4. Matter accordingly stands closed and disposed of.

Judge

2026:MLHC:622 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.06.26 18:02:29 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead