Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./109/2026 of NONI CHAKRABORTY Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 25 June 2026
No. 01 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 109 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.06.2026 Shri. Noni Chakraborty Son of (L) S. Chakraborty (Convict presently serving sentence At Shillong District Jail, Shillong). Resident of Laban, Shillong, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya
Serial No. 01
Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No. 109 of 2026
Date of Decision: 25.06.2026
Shri. Noni Chakraborty
Son of (L) S. Chakraborty
(Convict presently serving sentence
At Shillong District Jail, Shillong).
Resident of Laban,
Shillong, East Khasi Hills,
Meghalaya
……Petitioner
VERSUS
State of Meghalaya
Through the Commissioner & Secretary
to the Government of Meghalaya,
Department of Home (Police),
Civil Secretariat, Shillong
……Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)
: Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv. with
Mr. S. Chanda, Adv.
Mr. T.S.C. Lama, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. P.P
Mr. S. Sengupta, Addl. P.P
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No
2026:MLHC:617
ORDER (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. K. Paul, learned Sr. counsel for the applicant.
2. Also heard Mr. H. Kharmih, learned Addl. P.P for the State respondent.
3. This petition has been filed for condonation of delay of 355 days in filing the related appeal on the grounds of non-availability of the required funds to engage a counsel and that the petitioner was also unwell and was lately admitted to Civil Hospital for his treatment. Hence the delay.
4. It is therefore prayed that the delay of 355 days may be condoned on the above grounds cited.
5. The learned Addl. P.P has no objection to the prayer made.
6. This Court on consideration of the submission made is convinced that the grounds cited are genuine and accordingly, the delay of 355 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned.
7. Petition disposed of.
8. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1(one) week. Judge Meghalaya 25.06.2026 “Tiprilynti–PS” 2026:MLHC:617 Digitally signed by TIPRILYNTI KHARKONGOR Date: 2026.06.25 17:06:53 IST Signature Not Verified