Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./105/2026 of MUKTA M. SANGMA Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. on 18 June 2026
of 2 Serial No.02 Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl. M.C. No. 105 of 2026 Date of Order: 18.06.2026 Smti Mukta M. Sangma, W/o Shri. Ruel A . Sangma, R/o Forestilla, Tura, West Garo Hills district, Meghalaya. …..Applicant -VERSUS- 1. State of Meghalaya Represented by
Serial No.02
Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl. M.C. No. 105 of 2026
Date of Order: 18.06.2026
Smti Mukta M. Sangma,
W/o Shri. Ruel A. Sangma,
R/o Forestilla, Tura,
West Garo Hills district, Meghalaya.
…..Applicant
-VERSUS-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Meghalaya
Represented by the Commissioner &
Secretary, Home (Police) Department,
Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. Smti. X (Complainant), of Tura Women PS Case No. 13 / 2025, Through its Investigating Officer.
…..Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Dey, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Ms. R. Gurung, GA.
(ORAL) Heard learned counsels appearing for the parties. By this application, the applicant has sought exemption from placing on record the certified copies of the impugned orders dated 03.02.2026 and 2026:MLHC:600
12.05.2026 passed by the Special Judge (POCSO), West Garo Hills District in Special (POCSO) Case No. 39 of 2025. Mr. S. Dey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that as procurement of certified copies of the aforesaid orders is likely to take some time, the applicant may be allowed to prefer the connected revision petition without the certified copies of the impugned orders. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State-respondent, has no objection to the prayer made. This application is, therefore, disposed of by allowing the applicant to prefer the connected revision petition without production of certified copies of the impugned orders, on condition that the certified copies of the said orders shall be placed before this Court as and when the same are obtained by the applicant.
Judge
Meghalaya 18.06.2026 Abhinandan, P.S 2026:MLHC:600 Digitally signed by ABHINANDAN KUMAR Date: 2026.06.18 16:24:35 IST Signature Not Verified