Meghalaya High Court
Cont.Cas(C)/47/2025 of SUNIL MODOK Vs PETER MARAK on 16 June 2026
Serial No. 04 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Cont.Cas(C) No. 47 of 2025 Date of Decision: 16.06.2026 Shri Sunil Modok S/o (L) Kali Kanta Modok, R/o Majherchar, P.O. & P.S. Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya ….. Petitioner(s) Versus Shri Peter
Serial No. 04
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Cont.Cas(C) No. 47 of 2025
Date of Decision: 16.06.2026
Shri Sunil Modok
S/o (L) Kali Kanta Modok,
R/o Majherchar, P.O. & P.S. Mahendraganj, South West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya
….. Petitioner(s)
Versus
Shri Peter Marak,
Secretary, Executive Committee,
Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura
…. Respondent(s)
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. M.R. Marak, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Dey, Adv. with
Ms. N. Lamare, Adv.
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The petitioner has filed the contempt application alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 16.04.2025, with regard to the issuance of a joint Patta to the petitioner and to one Shri Kamini Modok.
2. Today, Mr. S. Dey, learned counsel for the respondents has produced a copy of the notice in the said matter, which shows that the petitioner and one Shri Kamini Modok have received the notice in the mutation proceedings. He submits that in spite of receipt of the notice, which is evidenced by the signatures which are appended thereto, the petitioner nor the said Shri Kamini Modok appeared before the authorities. He further submits that the filing of the instant contempt application is mischievous with the aim to browbeat the respondents.
3. This Court takes note of the submissions and has also examined the Notice under Section-52 of the Assam Land Revenue Regulation 1886. It is also noted that the same has been received by the petitioner and by Shri Kamini Modok, the signature in the notice and in the affidavit appears to be of the petitioner.
4. In this view of the matter, this Court takes serious note of the same and while closing the contempt application, though more stringent steps are called for, however closes this matter by imposing cost on the petitioner of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) only to be paid to the High Court Bar Association, within a period of 2(two) weeks, from today.
5. The matter stands closed and disposed of.
JUDGE
Meghalaya 16.06.2026 “V. Lyndem-AR-PS”
Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.06.17 18:40:20 IST Signature Not Verified