Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/105/2026 of BHARAT CHETTRI Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 11 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.07 Supp. List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 105 of 2026 Date of Decision: 11.06.2026 Shri. Bharat Chettri S/o (L) Dhan Bahadur Chettri R/o Barapathar, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya – 793021. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya, through the Director General of

Serial No.07

Supp. List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 105 of 2026

Date of Decision: 11.06.2026

Shri. Bharat Chettri

S/o (L) Dhan Bahadur Chettri

R/o Barapathar, East Khasi Hills,

Meghalaya – 793021.

…Petitioner

-Versus-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Meghalaya, through the Director General of Police (DGP), State Cyber Crime Cell, Police Headquarters, Secretariat Hills, Shillong – 793001, Meghalaya.

2. State of Kerala, through the Director General of Police Station, S.H.O, Cyber Crime P.S. Pattanakadu, Alappuzha, District Crime Branch, Kerela-688001.

3. Bank of India, Mawlai Branch, Meghalaya-793021 through its Branch Manager.

…Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. S.A.Majaw, Adv.

Ms. B.Lyngdoh, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mrs. T.Yangi B, AAG with

Mr. J.N.Rynjah, GA for R 1.

Mr. S. Dey, Adv. with

Ms. N.Lamare, Adv. for R 3.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Mr. S.Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3 has produced the instructions dated 10-06-2026, whereby the Bank has no objection in permitting the Account Holder, namely Shri. Bharat Chettri, holder of Account No. 506311610000065 in operating the undisputed amount available in his account.

2. In view of the instructions, it is directed that the account of the petitioner being No. 506311610000065 as far as the undisputed amount is concerned, shall be defrozen and the petitioner allowed to operate his account.

3. The parties submit that in view of the order passed by the Court, the matter may be closed.

4. Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of.

Judge

2026:MLHC:570 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.06.11 17:54:36 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead