Meghalaya High Court
AB/20/2026 of GOPAL BASUMATARI Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 11 June 2026
Supplementary List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 20 of 2026 Date of Decision: 11.06.2026 Gopal Basumatari, aged About 30 years, S/o Suren Basumatari, R/o Maugaugpara, P.S. Gobordhana, Sub-Dist: Salbari, Dist: Baksa, Assam PIN- …….. Petitioner - Vs- The State of
Serial No. 01
Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
AB. No. 20 of 2026
Date of Decision: 11.06.2026
Gopal Basumatari, aged
About 30 years, S/o Suren
Basumatari, R/o Maugaugpara,
P.S. Gobordhana, Sub-Dist: Salbari,
Dist: Baksa, Assam PIN-
…….. Petitioner
- Vs-
The State of Meghalaya
(represented by Public
Prosecutor, Meghalaya).
……… Opposite Party
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)
:
Mr. P.S. Biswas, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
:
Mr. R. Gurung, GA.
Mr. H. Kharmih, Addl. PP.
Ms. O.A.I. Bang, GA.
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. P.S. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner, who has submitted that the petitioner has been impleaded as an accused in GR Case No. 66/2015 under Section 380/34 IPC pending before the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, East Jaintia Hills District, Khliehriat. The stage of the case is for appearance of the accused and for recording of evidence of the prosecution witnesses.
2. It is the submission of the learned counsel that the petitioner has not received any summons to appear before the court, but only when the process thereafter was initiated that he came to know of his involvement in the case.
3. This being the case, apprehending imminent arrest, the petitioner has approached this Court with this instant application with a prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail, and further, with an undertaking that he will appear before the court as and when required.
4. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the opposite party has submitted that this is a long pending case and that the petitioner having not been arrested for so long, therefore, there is no question of apprehension. It is prayed that this petition may be dismissed.
5. This Court has considered the submission made, and has also looked into the sections of law involved i.e. Section 380 which carries therein a period of punishment which may extend to seven years, with fine.
6. Without going into the issue of whether relevant notice has been issued upon the petitioner/accused, this Court, at this juncture, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also that the stage of the case is for recording of evidence, therefore, the prayer of the petitioner is hereby considered on certain conditions to be imposed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of his arrest, the petitioner/accused is directed to be enlarged on bail on the following conditions:
i) That he shall not abscond or tamper with the evidence or witnesses;
ii) That he shall attend court as and when called for;
iii) That he shall not leave the jurisdiction of Meghalaya, except with due permission of the court concerned; and
iv) That he shall bind himself on a personal bond of ₹ 30,000/- (Rupees thirty thousand) with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.
8. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Judge
Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.06.11 17:29:45 IST Signature Not Verified