Meghalaya High Court
MC(CRP)/5/2026 of JIMMY GOODWILL KHARKONGOR Vs NEWZEALAND WAHLANG AND 2 ORS. on 10 June 2026
of 2 Serial No.01 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC (CRP) No. 5 of 2026 in CRP No. 18 of 2025 Date of Order: 10.06.2026 Shri Jimmy Goodwill Kharkongor, S/o (L) Britchard Gatphoh, R/o Umpling Lumdiengmet, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …..Applicant -VERSUS-
Serial No.01
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC (CRP) No. 5 of 2026 in
CRP No. 18 of 2025
Date of Order: 10.06.2026
Shri Jimmy Goodwill Kharkongor,
S/o (L) Britchard Gatphoh,
R/o Umpling Lumdiengmet, Shillong,
East Khasi Hills District,
Meghalaya.
…..Applicant
-VERSUS-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Smti Newzealand Wahlang, D/o (L) Nebelin Wahlang, R/o 570 G. S. Road, Near CHC Hospital. Mawiong Umjapung, Nongneng В. Mawiong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
…..Opposite Party
2. The Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
3. The Sub-Registrar, East Khasi Hills District, Shillong, Meghalaya.
…..Pro-forma Opposite Parties
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge 2026:MLHC:563
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. E. Laloo, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. S. Sen, Adv. (R:1)
Ms. I. Lyngwa, GA. (R: 2 & 3)
(ORAL) Heard Mr. E. Laloo, learned counsel appearing for the applicant, Mr. S. Sen, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.1 and also Ms. I. Lyngwa, learned GA appearing for the pro-forma opposite party Nos. 2 & 3. This is an application for substitution of respondent No.1 in Civil Revision Petition No. 18 of 2025 by the opposite party No.1. herein. It is stated that the original respondent in the civil revision petition who was the plaintiff in Title Suit No. 314 (T) of 2013, has passed away on 20.07.2025. It is also submitted that pursuant to the demise of the original respondent No.1/plaintiff, opposite party No.1 herein has been substituted in place of the deceased in the Title Suit No. 314(T) of 2013. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the prayer made in this application. Resultantly, the application is allowed. The opposite party No.1 herein is substituted in place of the respondent No.1 in CRP No. 18 of 2025. The applicant shall take appropriate steps to modify the cause title of the CRP No. 18 of 2025. The application stands disposed of.
Judge
Meghalaya 10.06.2026 Abhinandan, P.S 2026:MLHC:563 Digitally signed by ABHINANDAN KUMAR Date: 2026.06.10 20:10:43 IST Signature Not Verified