Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/167/2026 of SHNAT RAID TYNRING AND ANR. Vs KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ORS. on 4 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Serial No. 29 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 167 of 2026 Date of Decision: 04.06.2026 1. Shnat Raid Tynring Khyrim Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District represented by its elected Sordar, Shri Wordington Nongrum, Meghalaya 2. Shri Wordington Nongrum, Elected Sordar of Shnat Raid

Serial No. 29

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C) No. 167 of 2026

Date of Decision: 04.06.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Shnat Raid Tynring Khyrim Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District represented by its elected Sordar, Shri Wordington Nongrum, Meghalaya

2. Shri Wordington Nongrum, Elected Sordar of Shnat Raid Tynring, Khyrim Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya

…. Writ Petitioner(s) Versus

1. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Represented by its Secretary, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya

2. Executive Committee Khasi Hills, Meghalaya East Khasi Hills District.

3. Member In-charge Elaka Administration Khasi Hills, Meghalaya

4. Under Secretary to the Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong

5. Shri Hamsilet Mylliempdah, Pohktieh, Nongthymmai, Shillong-793014, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya

… Respondent(s)

6. Khyrim Syiemship represented by its Chief, Khyrim Syiemship, East Khasi Hills District.

… Proforma Respondent(s)

2026:MLHC:529

_______________________________________________________

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.A. Dohkrut, Adv.

For the Respondent(s) : Ms. P.S. Nongbri, Adv. (For R 1-4)

Mr. K Ch. Gautam, Adv. (For R 5)

Mrs. N.G. Shylla, Adv. with

Ms. B. Diengdoh, Adv. (For R 6)

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Though this matter has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the impugned order has since lost its force, this Court only notes that the contents of the same are improper, inasmuch as, apart from being vague no details are given as under what circumstances the respondent No. 5, has been directed to conduct the meeting.

2. Be that as it may, as the date given therein has since lapsed, this matter is closed on being infructuous. JUDGE Meghalaya 04.06.2026 “V. Lyndem-PS/AR”

2026:MLHC:529 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.06.05 12:31:24 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead