Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/167/2026 of SHNAT RAID TYNRING AND ANR. Vs KHASI HILLS AUTONOMOUS DISTRICT COUNCIL AND ORS. on 4 June 2026
Serial No. 29 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 167 of 2026 Date of Decision: 04.06.2026 1. Shnat Raid Tynring Khyrim Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District represented by its elected Sordar, Shri Wordington Nongrum, Meghalaya 2. Shri Wordington Nongrum, Elected Sordar of Shnat Raid
Serial No. 29
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C) No. 167 of 2026
Date of Decision: 04.06.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Shnat Raid Tynring Khyrim Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District represented by its elected Sordar, Shri Wordington Nongrum, Meghalaya
2. Shri Wordington Nongrum, Elected Sordar of Shnat Raid Tynring, Khyrim Syiemship, Ri-Bhoi District, Meghalaya
…. Writ Petitioner(s) Versus
1. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Represented by its Secretary, East Khasi Hills, Meghalaya
2. Executive Committee Khasi Hills, Meghalaya East Khasi Hills District.
3. Member In-charge Elaka Administration Khasi Hills, Meghalaya
4. Under Secretary to the Executive Committee, Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council, Shillong
5. Shri Hamsilet Mylliempdah, Pohktieh, Nongthymmai, Shillong-793014, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya
… Respondent(s)
6. Khyrim Syiemship represented by its Chief, Khyrim Syiemship, East Khasi Hills District.
… Proforma Respondent(s)
2026:MLHC:529
_______________________________________________________
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. P.A. Dohkrut, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Ms. P.S. Nongbri, Adv. (For R 1-4)
Mr. K Ch. Gautam, Adv. (For R 5)
Mrs. N.G. Shylla, Adv. with
Ms. B. Diengdoh, Adv. (For R 6)
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press: JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Though this matter has been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that the impugned order has since lost its force, this Court only notes that the contents of the same are improper, inasmuch as, apart from being vague no details are given as under what circumstances the respondent No. 5, has been directed to conduct the meeting.
2. Be that as it may, as the date given therein has since lapsed, this matter is closed on being infructuous. JUDGE Meghalaya 04.06.2026 “V. Lyndem-PS/AR”
2026:MLHC:529 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2026.06.05 12:31:24 IST Signature Not Verified