Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/44/2026 of TIDYNESS KHARBYNGAR Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS. on 4 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.09 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 44 of 2026 Date of Decision: 04.06.2026 Smti. Tidyness Kharbyngar, Wife of (L) Dr. Ivanteilang War, Resident of Kharmalki, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by

Serial No.09

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 44 of 2026

Date of Decision: 04.06.2026

Smti. Tidyness Kharbyngar,

Wife of (L) Dr. Ivanteilang War,

Resident of Kharmalki,

East Khasi Hills District,

Meghalaya.

…Petitioner

-Versus-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The State of Meghalaya, Represented by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. The Director, Directorate of Educational Research & Training, Laitumkhrah, Shillong, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.

3. The Principal, District Institute of Education and Training, Thadlaskein, West Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.

4. Smti. Yeewa Sumer, Resident of Panaliar Jowai, West Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.

5. Smti. Quissila Warjri, Wife of (L) W. Soanes, Resident of Umpling, Lumdiengmet, Shillong, East Khas Hills District, Meghalaya.

…Respondents 2026:MLHC:527

[

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Ms. M.Mawthoh, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. Atiar S. Dey, GA for R 1-3.

Mr. R.K.Synrem, Adv. for R 4&5.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Ms. M.Mawthoh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the additional affidavit filed by the State respondents wherein the terminal amounts have been disclosed, the matter may be closed at this stage itself.

2. Accordingly, on the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner which is concurred to by the learned counsel for the respondents, the matter stands closed and disposed of.

Judge

2026:MLHC:527 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.06.04 18:57:01 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead