Meghalaya High Court
WP(C)/194/2026 of RUMI CH. MARAK Vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 1 June 2026
No.64 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 194 of 2026 Date of Decision: 01.06.2026 Smti. Rumi Ch. Marak, W/o (L) Emmanuel Arengh R/o Warimagre, P.O & P.S. Williamnagar, East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Meghalaya
Serial No.64
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
WP(C). No. 194 of 2026
Date of Decision: 01.06.2026
Smti. Rumi Ch. Marak,
W/o (L) Emmanuel Arengh
R/o Warimagre, P.O & P.S. Williamnagar,
East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.
…Petitioner
-Versus-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Meghalaya represented by the Commissioner and Secretary, to the Government of Meghalaya, Agriculture Department, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.
2. The Director of Agriculture Meghalaya Shillong East Khasi Hills District Meghalaya.
3. Assistant Agriculture Engineer (Mech), East Garo Hills District, Williamnagar.
4. Accountant General, East Khasi Hills, Shillong, Meghalaya.
5. The Secretary to the Govt. of Meghalaya Personnel & AR (B) Department.
…Respondents
2026:MLHC:508
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Ms. J.T.Sangma, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mrs. T.Yangi B, AAG with
Ms. I.Lyngwa, GA for R 1-3 & 5.
Mr. K.Kharmawphlang, Adv. with
Ms. E.B.Passah, Adv. for R 4.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc:
ii) Whether approved for publication
Yes/No
in press:
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Ms. J.T.Sangma, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the prayer made in the writ petition has already been addressed, she prays that she may be allowed to withdraw this instant matter.
2. Same is not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Accordingly, on the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal.
Judge
2026:MLHC:508 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.06.01 19:46:24 IST Signature Not Verified