Meghalaya High Court
MC(MACApp)/5/2025 of MADANLAL SWAMI Vs ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANZ INSURANCE CO. LTD. AND 2 ORS. on 15 May 2026
No. 03 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG MC(MACApp) No. 5 of 2025 Date of Decision: 15.05.2026 Shri. Madanlal Swami, S/o (L) Girdharilal Swami, R/o Phagoriya Dhani, Chirana, Jhunjhun, Rajasthan. …….. Applicant - Vs- 1. Royal Sundaram Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Serial No. 03
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
MC(MACApp) No. 5 of 2025
Date of Decision: 15.05.2026
Shri. Madanlal Swami,
S/o (L) Girdharilal Swami,
R/o Phagoriya Dhani, Chirana,
Jhunjhun, Rajasthan.
…….. Applicant
- Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Royal Sundaram Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd., Sundaram Towers, 45 & 46, Whites Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu-600014.
2. Shri. Surendra Kumar Jangid,
S/o Om Prakash Jangid,
S.S. Body Garage, Opp. Petrol Pump,
Jogigopa, Goalpara, Assam.
3. Shri. Banwarilal Swami,
S/o Shrichand Swami,
Rajasthan.
……… Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. B. Iawim, Adv. vice
Mr. Philemon Nongbri, Adv.
For the Respondent(s)
: Mr. D. Hynniewta, Adv. for R 2.
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication in press:
Yes/No
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Mr. B. Iawim, learned counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that this Court vide order dated 30.04.2026, has given last opportunity to the respondent No. 1 to appear before this Court, however, the said respondent No. 1 has failed to make his appearance today. It is prayed that necessary orders may be passed in this regard.
2. Since the respondent No. 1 has failed to appear, accordingly, matter shall proceed ex-parte against such respondent.
3. Mr. D. Hynniewta, learned counsel is present on behalf of the respondent No. 2.
4. This is an application for condonation of delay in filing the related appeal against the impugned judgment and order dated 03.03.2025 passed by the Court of the learned MACT, Tura, West Garo Hills District in MACT Case No. 1 of 2024.
5. This Court on consideration of the submission made, is convinced that sufficient grounds have been cited to allow condonation of such delay. Accordingly, delay is condoned.
6. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after
2(two) weeks.
7. Misc. Case disposed of.
Judge
2026:MLHC:470 Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.05.15 19:36:25 IST Signature Not Verified