Meghalaya High Court

Crl.Petn./49/2026 of ENAMUL HOQUE Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS on 12 May 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.Petn.No.49/2026 Date of Order: 12.05.2026 Enamul Hoque ..... Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Meghalaya, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary, Home Police Department, Meghalaya, Shillong. 2. Director General of Police, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.Petn.No.49/2026

Date of Order: 12.05.2026

Enamul Hoque ..... Petitioner

Vs.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Meghalaya, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary, Home Police Department, Meghalaya, Shillong.

2. Director General of Police, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong.

3. The Superintendent of Police, West Garo Hills District, Tura, Meghalaya.

4. Officer-in-Charge, Araimile Police Station, West Garo Hills, District, Tura, Meghalaya.

5. Officer-in-Charge, Songsak Police Station, West Garo Hills, District, Tura, Meghalaya.

6. Officer-in-Charge, Phulbari Police Station, West Garo Hills, District, Tura, Meghalaya. ..... Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Revati Mohite Dere, Chief Justice Appearance: For the Petitioner : Mr. K. Ch Gautam, Adv with

Ms. R. Kharshiing, Adv

For the Respondents : Mrs. N.G. Shylla, PP with

Mr. A.M. Pala, GA

Serial No.04 Daily List

ORDER: (Oral)

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner presses for only one relief i.e., a direction to the respondent authorities to club/consolidate the two FIRs registered with Songsak Police Station and Phulbari Police Station i.e., Songsak P.S. Case No.07/2026 and Phulbari P.S. Case No.11/2026 with the FIR registered with Araimile Police Station being P.S. Case No.19/2026.

3. In view of the aforesaid, it is made clear that this Court has not gone into any of other relief sought for by the petitioner and as such restricts itself to the relief pressed for by the petitioner.

4. Learned PP fairly on instructions states that all the three cases which are registered, are out of a common Facebook post and identical allegations. She states that the cases registered with Songsak Police Station and Phulbari Police Station will be clubbed with Araimile Police Station, which was registered first in point of time and will be investigated together. Statement accepted.

5. In view of the aforesaid, nothing survives for further consideration in the petition, the petition stands disposed of.

6. All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.

(Revati Mohite Dere)

Chief Justice

Meghalaya 12.05.2026 “Lam DR-PS” 2026:MLHC:447 Digitally signed by LAMPHRANG KHARCHANDY Date: 2026.05.12 15:46:46 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead