Meghalaya High Court
AB/5/2026 of RAHUL GOUR Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. on 7 May 2026
OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG AB. No. 5 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.05.2026 Shri Rahul Gour S/o Shri. Gopal K. Gour, R/o Rukmani Jewellers (P) Ltd, Shivshakti Paradise G-66-67, Central Soine Rd. Sector-2, Central Spince, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan-302039. Represented by Shri Suraj Kumar,
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
AB. No. 5 of 2026
Date of Decision: 07.05.2026
Shri Rahul Gour
S/o Shri. Gopal K. Gour,
R/o Rukmani Jewellers (P) Ltd,
Shivshakti Paradise G-66-67,
Central Soine Rd. Sector-2, Central Spince, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur Rajasthan-302039.
Represented by Shri Suraj Kumar, (Power of Attorney Holder)
S/o Shri Diwani Ram
R/o Pithoragarh, Bilai,
Uttarakhand – 262520.
…. Petitioner
- Vs-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Meghalaya,
Represented by its Secretary, Home Police Department, Govt. of Meghalaya, Shillong
2. Superintendent of Police,
Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh,
Meghalaya.
3. Officer-in-Charge,
Khanapara Police Station,
Ri-Bhoi District,
Meghalaya
4. Smti Suchona Ch. Sangma
W/o Limison D. Sangma
R/o Boldampitbari,
PO/ PS Tikrikilla,
West Garo Hills District, Serial No. 03 Regular List
Meghalaya
(Respondent No. 4 struck off vide order dated 27.03.2026) …. Respondents
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
i) Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. K. Paul, Sr. Adv with
Mr. S. Chanda, Adv.
Ms. S. Khatun, Adv.
Mr. T.C.S. Lama, Adv.
For the Respondent(s) : Mrs. N.G. Shylla, Sr. GA with
Mr. J.N. Rynjah, GA.
JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. Heard Mr. K. Paul, learned Sr. counsel along with Mr. S. Chanda, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that through inadvertence, this application was filed before this Court, the fact being that on an application made by the petitioner herein before the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the same being Criminal Appeal. No. 2077 of 2025, the Apex Court vide order dated 21.04.2025, has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Khanapara P.S Case No. 25 (7) 2024. Accordingly, in the view of the said order dated 21.04.2025, this petition may be disposed of by this Court, submits the learned Sr. counsel.
2. Mrs. N.G. Shylla, learned Sr. GA along with Mr. J. N. Rynjah, learned GA appearing for the State respondent, has no objection to the submission made in view of the said order dated 21.04.2025, passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
3. This Court has also perused the said order dated 21.04.2025 (supra), and is made aware that the petitioner herein, has indeed been granted anticipatory bail in connection with his involvement in the said Khananpara P.S Case No. 25
(7) of 2024. As such, this petition is hereby disposed of as not pressed.
Judge
Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.05.07 18:53:18 IST Signature Not Verified