Meghalaya High Court

WP(C)/133/2025 of ABHISHEK GUPTA Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND 4 ORS. on 29 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

No.138 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C). No. 133 of 2025 Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 Shri. Abhishek Gupta, S/o Shri. Hare Krishna Prasad Gupta, R/o 318, Near Tura Masjid, Tura Bazar, Tura, West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. …Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Meghalaya

Serial No.138

Regular List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

WP(C). No. 133 of 2025

Date of Decision: 29.04.2026

Shri. Abhishek Gupta,

S/o Shri. Hare Krishna Prasad Gupta,

R/o 318, Near Tura Masjid, Tura Bazar,

Tura, West Garo Hills District,

Meghalaya.

…Petitioner

-Versus-

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. State of Meghalaya Represented by its Chief Secretary, Government of Meghalaya.

2. Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Meghalaya.

3. Secretary Department of Health, Government of Meghalaya.

4. The Director General of Police, Meghalaya.

5. Sub-Inspector Shri. Patrick S. Sangma, Investigating Officer in Bajengdoba, P.S. Case No. 14 of 2024, Bajengdoba Police Station, North Garo Hills District, Meghalaya.

6. Officer-in-Charge Bajengdoba, National Highway 51, Bajengdoba, Meghalaya – 794004.

2026:MLHC:410

7. Commissioner & Secretary to the Power Department, Government of Meghalaya, Secretariat Hills, Shillong, Meghalaya – 793001.

…Respondents

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice H.S.Thangkhiew, Judge

Appearance: For the Petitioner/Applicant(s) : Mr. N.Khera, Adv.

Mr. R.Kharkrang, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

: Mr. N.D.Chullai, AAG with

Ms. Z.E.Nongkynrih, GA.

i) Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc:

ii) Whether approved for publication

Yes/No

in press:

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

1. Mr. N.Khera, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be allowed to withdraw this instant writ petition, as alternate remedy has been availed.

2. Same is not objected to by the respondents.

3. Accordingly, matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal.

Judge

2026:MLHC:410 Digitally signed by SAMANTHA ANNA LIYA RYNJAH Date: 2026.04.29 17:15:08 IST Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead