Meghalaya High Court
Crl.M.C./66/2026 of SAMUEL THABAH Vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA on 27 April 2026
No. 04 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG Crl.M.C. No. 66 of 2026 Date of Decision: 27.04.2026 Shri. Samuel Thabah, S/o (L) S. Shongwan, R/o Laitkynsew Village, Sohra, East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya. .…….. Applicant -Vs- State of Meghalaya represented by the
Serial No. 04
Regular List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Crl.M.C. No. 66 of 2026
Date of Decision: 27.04.2026
Shri. Samuel Thabah,
S/o (L) S. Shongwan,
R/o Laitkynsew Village, Sohra,
East Khasi Hills District, Meghalaya.
.…….. Applicant
-Vs-
State of Meghalaya represented by the
Public Prosecutor/Special Public Prosecutor.
………… Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Applicant(s)
:
Mr. S. Deb, Legal Aid Counsel.
For the Respondent(s)
:
Mr. R. Gurung, GA.
i)
Whether approved for reporting in
Yes/No
Law journals etc.:
ii)
Whether approved for publication
in press:
Yes/No
Per W. Diengdoh, (J):
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the applicant, who has submitted that the applicant has preferred an appeal before this Court against the impugned judgment dated 25.06.2025 and related order of sentence dated 26.06.2025 passed by the Court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), Ri-Bhoi District, Nongpoh in Special (POCSO) Case No. 2 of 2020.
2. However, while preferring an appeal, a delay of 238 days has occurred, due to circumstances which is beyond the control of the applicant, since he is aged, uneducated and coming from a poor financial background, is not aware of his legal rights to file appeal or to engage a private counsel. As such, he could not prefer an appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Thereafter, legal aid was sought for, and accordingly, this application was processed through Legal Aid Counsel. It is therefore prayed that the delay be condoned and the appeal be admitted.
3. Mr. R. Gurung, learned GA appearing for the State respondent has no objection to the prayer for condonation of the delay.
4. On consideration of the submission made, we are persuaded to allow this application on being satisfied that the grounds cited for the delay contain sufficient cause. Accordingly, the delay of 238 days in preferring the appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Registry is directed to diarize the appeal and list it for admission after 1(one) week.
6. Misc. Case disposed of.
(B. Bhattacharjee) (W. Diengdoh)
Judge Judge
2026:MLHC:404-DB Digitally signed by DARIKORDOR NARY Date: 2026.04.27 19:10:02 IST Signature Not Verified